by Johnny
Who would have thought that Michael D. O’Brien and Lev Grossman would have something in common, particularly since both, while holding diametrically opposing worldviews, are so eager to say that there is no God in Harry Potter. And they proclaim this in the midst of an overwhelming positive response to the Christian themes in Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows. Perhaps we can forgive them for being too pompous or stubborn to acknowledge these reviews, but there is no excuse for them to ignore the words of J.K. Rowling. Consider what she said on the Today Show with Meredith Vieira:
Well, there– there clearly is a religious– undertone. And– it’s always been difficult to talk about that because until we reached Book Seven, views of what happens after death and so on, it would give away a lot of what was coming.
In the past JKR has shown reticence in sharing her religious beliefs lest they would give away what was coming in the books. In an Vancouver Sun interview that every Christian fan of the series should know, Max Wyman asked her if she was a Christian and she answered yes before saying:
Which seems to offend the religious right far worse than if I said I thought there was no God. Every time I’ve been asked if I believe in God, I’ve said yes, because I do, but no one ever really has gone any more deeply into it than that, and I have to say that does suit me, because if I talk too freely about that I think the intelligent reader, whether 10 or 60, will be able to guess what’s coming in the books.
In an earlier interview with Evan Solomon, JKR expressed her frustration and said, “Again, there is so much I would like to say, and come back when I’ve written book seven. But then maybe you won’t need to even say it ‘cause you’ll have found it out anyway. You’ll have read it.” This frustration was due to the protest of the novels by South Carolinians and all the persistent questioning of JKR’s religious views in light of all the magic in her books. I have documented elsewhere the evidence for JKR being a Christian and religion in Harry Potter, but the point is that anyone who neglects to pay attention to an author’s words when trying to examine their work, do so at their own peril.
Now what about the last novel? What did O’Brien and Grossman miss? First are the scriptures that Albus Dumbledore chose for the tomb epitaphs for Kendra and Ariana Dumbledore (“Where your treasure is, there will your heart be also”), and presumably for James and Lilly Potter (“The last enemy that shall be destroyed is death”) in Deathly Hallows. These scriptures, found in Matthew 6.21 and 1 Corinthians 15:26 respectively, were not lifted out of the Bible at random, but are relevant verses for the storyline. The context of the first verse is that one cannot serve two masters, God and money. Dumbledore was seduced by power and the quest for immortality through the Deathly Hallows. As a consequence, his foolhardy quest led ultimately to the death of his sister, Ariana. We can argue that Dumbledore settled for earthly treasures rather than the heavenly treasures that Christ spoke about. The context of the second verse is of course Christ’s Resurrection and the hope for our own. As Christ sacrificed himself and rose from the dead three days later, Harry Potter laid down his life for those fighting against evil and in the end, triumphed over Voldemort, thus saving the wizarding world. This would make Harry a Christ figure in the novels. What is even more fascinating about these scriptures is the fact that Dumbledore is aware and probably owns a Bible himself.
Second would be the presence of a church in Godric’s Hollow. Yes, an actual church serving as a backdrop to the cemetery outside it. While Harry and Hermione were busy searching for his parents tombstone, parishioners inside the church were singing Christmas carols. Perhaps they were singing “O, Come All Ye Faithful” or “God Rest Ye Merry Gentlemen”, which are two carols mentioned (or alluded to in the case of the second) in Goblet of Fire and Order of the Phoenix respectively. If you look at the lyrics of these songs, they are filled with explicit references to God. Harry and Hermione were within earshot of the carol singers and even after they found the grave of Harry’s parents, Harry felt like suggesting to Hermione that they should take refuge in the church.
O’Brien and Grossman are wrong about the death of God in Deathly Hallows. The awareness of biblical scripture and the presence of a church in Godric’s Hollow are enough examples to cast doubt on O’Brien and Grossman’s conclusion that Harry Potter is devoid of God. Even more important is that we have to take into account JKR’s statements regarding her work. If she says that her belief in God is the key to unraveling the series conclusion, then we have to take this into account when examining whether God appears in the series. O’Brien and Grossman fail to do this. Strange bedfellows, indeed.



{ 9 comments… read them below or add one }
Dave the Longwinded
09.06.07 at 12:44 pm
But you’re a charitable thinker willing to consider Rowling’s Christianity. For fundamentalists, it’s not about “her Christian faith”; it’s about their Christian faith. In Grossman’s case, it’s about a pure misunderstanding of faith in general, I think.
Eeyore
09.06.07 at 2:04 pm
I completely agree with you both. One of the things I’ve found interesting, yet disturbing, is that people I know who are not Christian (or of any religion) are having the hardest time with Deathly Hallows. They didn’t like it; they think the story line was a cop out; they think that Rowling was tired of the story and could have done better by all the characters.
I can’t even talk to them about it, because I know it will end in a huge fight. They didn’t like DH because it didn’t fit with their idea of where the story should go and they don’t like the Christian aspects that they see–it challenges their beliefs (or lack of them), and after reading the series and talking for the last 5 or 6 years, they are finding themselves in a very uncomfortable position of having to admit that the stories do have a decidedly Christian theme. (Which is what I told them after Order of the Phoenix when they were annoyed that the answer to defeating Voldemort would be “love conquers all”.) I’ve actually had to quit talking to them altogether, as I find I really want to say “I told you so”, but that’s not very kind. The other problem they are having is that they are very tied to some fan fiction that one of them wrote–the first one and parts of the second were quite good, for fan fic. (I’m not trying to offend people who like fanfic, but most of it strays so far from canon that I just can’t read it.)
I think with people like O’Brien and Grossman they fall into the same trap–they are so tied to their own theories about what Rowling is writing that they have forgotten to read the stories with an open mind to see what is really there. It’s just not that hard to see unless the reader is determined to see something else.
Pat
Scott
09.06.07 at 2:36 pm
Here’s my question. So, what if there WASN’T any God in the HP books? What if O’Brien and Grossman were correct? It is still a great story. It is still a ripping good yarn. Why can’t they accept it as just a good story even if they refuse to see the Christian themes? I have yet to see any great harm come from people reading these books. There are no news articles about some kid in a small town that actually learned magic and killed his family or anything like that. Nothing.
I have said elsewhere that I don’t necessarily think JKR is the best writer, although she has gotten better. She IS a fabulous story teller. But if the quality of writing in HP is less than the biggies like Tolkien and Lewis, it is still miles ahead of what kids get when they sit in front of the TV all day, or play their XBox for hours. It still makes their imagination work. And I don’t think most people would argue that’s a bad thing. Maybe O’Brien and Grossman would because you need a closed mind to buy their line.
korg20000bc
09.06.07 at 5:40 pm
I feel that commentators like O’Brien and Grossman have come out publically only because of the success of the stories. Anything less popular, in that genre, is beneath their consideration. It seems to be “Our way or not at all.”
Scott, I agree completely. It appears that “serious” readers don’t read fantasy or science fiction. They’re missing out on a lot.
I was just watching a talk by a Christian preacher called “Aliens, UFO’s and the Bible”. His conclusions were pretty good but how he got there was not. “Evolution AND Science Fiction” are the tools that the enemy is using to increase the unbelief in the world.
Matthew
revgeorge
09.06.07 at 5:48 pm
Great article, Johnny!
It seems as if some of these critics read Rowling like the higher critics read the Bible. Oh, it can’t mean what it says here. They must’ve meant something else or they’re leaving something out. Or more crassly, like any Biblical miracles, miracles don’t happen so these Biblical ones are just made up.
But the highest duty of a critic is to actually deal with the text itself & not their preconceptions of it. And it goes without saying, although I’ll say it, to help understand the context & intent of the text, the best person to ask is the author!
So, the critics of Harry Potter seem to be going off the edge either way, whether reading it with their anti-God preconceptions or their Potter just promotes witchcraft preconceptions.
Trish
09.06.07 at 6:20 pm
revgeorge–I agree.
Scott–I don’t agree, not completely. It is possible for some seemingly innocuous things to be stumbling blocks for some people. I am thinking in particular of a young Satanist who was interviewed for our local newspaper. He proudly declared that he became interested in Satanism because of the television sitcom “Bewitched”. I offer that for what it’s worth; you can believe it or not as you choose. But understand that there are some things that will affect others adversely that do not have any effect on you, and vice versa. It’s a matter for individual parents to decide.
I also don’t agree that reading any book is better than playing any video game. Many video games exercise the imagination far more than some books do. Again, it’s an individual matter.
Everybody–clearly, it’s silly to condemn a book one hasn’t read. But aren’t we all, including O’Brien and Grossman, really beating a dead horse here? If they can’t admit they’ve been wrong, they can’t. I’m getting tired of the whole foolish argument.
Scott
09.07.07 at 12:19 am
Trish, you are correct. And I understand that different things affect people differently. That is why I would never try to force people to read HP, in the same way that O’Brien and others are trying to force them NOT to. I only argue that they should not say it is only, and completely evil. My wife started reading the books originally because she worked in the church’s children’s dept. and had lots of parents asking about the controversy. After reading them, she ultimately told a lot of people to read the books themselves and decide whether they wanted their kids to read them. My sister let her kids decide on their own. Her oldest read the first two and stopped because he didn’t like how the books affected him. Smart kid.
On the video games? Name one game, that kids will actually play, that exercises their mind like a book does. There are certainly games out there, but I would argue that kids mostly think they’re boring. The cool games are Halo, racing games, sports games. I’m not saying those are bad. I myself am a big fan of Warcraft. But they don’t exercise your brain like a good book.
Black Angus
09.11.07 at 5:07 am
Trish, it is sad that something as light-weight as Bewitched leads to Satanism. But the Lord of the Rings led to prog rock. Narnia led to Happy Meal tie-ins. Anything good can be peverted.
I’m yet to hear of any verifiable evidence that proves Potter promotes paganism.
But as many have already noted about these critics, why let the facts get in the way of your argument?
Ethical Harry-haters should not take any royalties from their books because they are indirectly profiting off a work that is damning children to hell (ironic emoticon).
Westel
09.11.07 at 3:31 pm
Tolkien tells us that Gollum succumbed to the Ring according to the predisposition of his character. I was drawn to the occult as a child and teenager through Halloween, ghost stories, and horror films - but the cause was not directly due to these avenues: the fascination was already there. Now I know better to stay away from those things that, even in my adult Christian life, still draw me. The HP books *may* be an avenue for some, but the *cause*? That’s where the fine edge is, I think.
Oh, and as an aside, I looked up Ariana. It’s a variant of the Greek “Ariadne”, which means: “most holy”.