On a similar vein as Matthew’s post on fictional mentors, The Torch online has an article on the best pets, familiars, and animal companions in the fantasy genre.  The article, though, restricts itself to only those pets, familiars, and animals that have a real world counterpart.  But two Harry Potter pets make the list.  If you’d like to comment on this article, feel free to not restrict yourself to only real world animals but on any pet, familiar, or animal companion found in fantasy stories.  Enjoy!

Related Posts

• A Friday Folly & A Friday Forum Reminder
• Friday Forum Reminder
• They’re Adapting Your Favorite Book or Comic!!
• Potter Movies 8 Years Old!!
• Friday Forum Reminder

The last two words of Chapter 2 of Half-Blood Prince, “Spinner’s End,” are “fiery snake.”  These were very well-chosen words by J.K. Rowling, especially given what she wrote in Deathly Hallows. The term “fiery snake” is used to describe the third and binding magical movement of the Unbreakable Vow.

Dumbledore said to Snape in “The Prince’s Tale,” “You are a braver man by far than Igor Karkaroff.  You know, I sometimes think we Sort too soon…”  In the book’s Epilogue, Harry called Snape “the bravest man I ever knew.”

Snape is a “fiery snake” – a Gryffindor/Slytherin.  Those two words were chosen very carefully and deliberately, in the chapter which perhaps best illustrates Snape’s Gryffindor/Slytherin status, to foreshadow the bravery we’d learn about in Deathly Hallows from the words of Dumbledore and Harry about Snape. “Spinner’s End” is the only close-up we get of Snape outside of Harry’s perspective.

The moment of the Unbreakable Vow seems to be something of the beginning of the end for Snape.  His statement to Bellatrix that he “spun [Dumbledore] a tale of deepest remorse” is likely a play on words which is meant to get us to think of Snape as the “Spinner,” making “Spinner’s End” not just a place, but a reference to Snape himself.  “End” can refer to either the finish (in which case we’re thinking of the danger Snape is putting himself into, which could lead to his “end,” death) or to a goal or end-game (in which case we’re thinking of the mystery of Snape – what’s he doing here?  What’s his real goal?).  Either meaning works.

The thing that’s always bugged me about the Unbreakable Vow is that it would seem to put Snape in a precarious position with Voldemort.  Voldemort wanted Draco dead.  Snape then took a vow saying, “I’ll protect him and try my best to keep that from happening.”  Bellatrix witnessed this.  Couldn’t she have brought this story back to Voldemort?  Perhaps her intimation partway through the conversation that Voldemort is not speaking with her lately is enough to suggest that Bellatrix wouldn’t have the chance.  Still, one assumes that Snape takes this vow in order to keep his cover with Voldemort.  It seems Snape could have been convincing enough by simply saying, “I cannot take such a vow.  It is not the Dark Lord’s plans that I intervene to save Draco, but to kill Dumbledore should Draco fail.”  For that reason, the Unbreakable Vow subplot always seemed a little forced to me.

Bellatrix is another interesting character in this scene.  One might almost conclude that because Voldemort trusted Snape and Bellatrix did not, Bella is the smarter and more perceptive of the two.  But Narcissa’s refrain about how much Voldemort trusts Snape suggests a different reason for Bella’s mistrust: insane jealousy.

A final observation on Wormtail.  I had always assumed Voldemort put Wormtail with Snape to keep an eye on him, in case Snape really was in league with Dumbledore.  Deathly Hallows gives no indication that Voldemort distrusted Snape in the least, though we should also remember that Voldemort never fully trusted anyone.  I’ve come to think it more likely that the primary motivation for Wormtail’s placement was to keep Wormtail in check.  It’s less likely Voldemort trusted Wormtail than Snape.  Or perhaps it’s a both/and.  He didn’t fully trust either, and assumed either would be quite ready to report on the other in the event of any suspicious activity.

There’s a lot of talk about in this chapter, and certainly stuff I’ve missed.  Feel free to start conversation on my observations or anything else about Chapter 2 of Half-Blood Prince.

Related Posts

• The Hog’s Head Half-Blood Prince Read-Through
• The White Tomb
• The Phoenix Lament
• The Flight of the Prince, by Lily Luna
• The Lightning-Struck Tower, by Red Rocker

When I wrote the post, “Shades of Evil,” I’d no idea Rowling had used that exact phrase in an interview with Entertainment Weekly in 2000.  Here’s the quote:

You have a choice when you’re going to introduce a very evil character.  You can dress a guy up with loads of ammunition, put a black Stetson on him, and say, “Bad guy.  Shoot him.”  I’m writing about shades of evil.  You have Voldemort, a raging psychopath, devoid of the normal human responses to other people’s suffering, and there are people like that in the world.  But then you have Wormtail, who out of cowardice will stand in the shadow of the strongest person.

I found the quote in the Borders’ release, The Great Snape Debate, which I’ll be reviewing in two parts once I’m done.  We can officially add a fourth shade of evil to my initial post – the evil that results from cowardice.

Related Posts

• No Related Post

Update: Move along to another essay. JKR destroyed this theory a couple days ago. So much for my attempts at predicting things!  Rowling’s statement doesn’t entirely annihilate the theory, since my particular version of the theory doesn’t have Snape hiding under the cloak at the house while the Potters were killed, but I’m moving on to other things for now, rather than scrambling to edit.

You’ll need to read my first shot at this to understand this second post, so make sure you read here first. This is probably really wrong. I’m just having a bit of fun, ’cause my HP work today has all been literary criticism (mythlogical archetypes), and that has been broken up by articles on the history of education.

I’m going to make an attempt at constructing an order of events for the handing off of James’ invisibility cloak that is (a) faithful to the canon (i.e., that James actually left the cloak in Dumbledore’s possession, and not a third person who picked it up on the night of the Potters’ deaths), and (b) ties significant plot points together, so as to be a “crucial” part of the plot.

Chronology
Dumbledore informed James and Lily that Voldemort was after them, based on information passed to him by the “spies he had in place, and that it would be best to go into hiding under the Fidelius charm. It is highly unlikely that the Potters ever knew Snape was spying on Lord Voldemort, or that he was ever a death eater. It’s just as unlikely that they ever knew about the prophecy. So we have a chronology of events like this (with some of my own speculation scattered in there):

1. Sometime in 1979, Wormtail starts passing information to Voldemort.
2. In Winter/Spring late 1979 or early 1980), Trelawney makes the prophecy, the first part of which is overheard by Snape, who runs and tells Voldemort immediately.
3. 1980: Two children are born “as the seventh month dies” – Neville Longbottom and Harry Potter. Voldemort selects Harry as the most likely candidate for prophecy fulfillment.
4. Snape, being one of Voldemort’s most trusted DEs, learns of this, and for reasons both explained and yet to be revealed, flees to Dumbledore in repentance. We do not have an exact timeline for this, but it was sometime in between August 1980 and September 1981. We’d want to favor an earlier date, probably August 1980, because there would need to be time for (a) Snape’s repentance, (b) that repentance to be believable to Dumbledore, and (c) Snape to turn spy for some time against Voldemort.
5. September 1981, Snape begins teaching at Hogwarts. As far as Voldemort is concerned, it’s on his orders, and as far as Dumbledore’s concerned, he’s been hired in order to fool Voldemort and remain a spy. Two people at this point know why Voldemort is specifically targeting the Potters: Snape and Dumbledore.
6. During this time, Dumbledore and the Order are doing everything to hide the Potters, whom Dumbledore has informed that Voldemort is specifically targeting (though he hasn’t told them why). But Voldemort is finding, torturing, and killing Order members to try to find the Potters. James and Lily want to remain in the battle against Voldemort, but Dumbledore finally advises them that the best course of action, especially for Harry’s sake, would be to hide under a Fidelius charm.
7. Even with Dumbledore’s offer on the table, James selects his best friend Sirius as Secret-Keeper; but at the last minute takes Sirius’s advice and makes Wormtail Secret-Keeper.
8. Prior to going under the Fidelius charm, James gives Dumbledore the invisibility cloak for use in the Order (we’ll explain the “use” below), since he’ll no longer need it hiding under the Fidelius charm.
9. October 24, 1981, the Potters are hid, and Wormtail is appointed Secret-Keeper of their location.
10. Sometime between October 24 and 31, Wormtail betrays the Potters to Voldemort.
11. On October 31, Voldemort attacks the Potters, killing Lily and James, but he meets his temporary demise with Harry.

So there we are, then. I think James’s passing the cloak to Dumbledore before going under the charm is best explanation for how it got into his possession. But why is that significant?

Invisibilty Cloaks Galore?

It’s been suggested that James wouldn’t have given Dumbledore the cloak just to be “used” by the Order, because, as Felicity notes, “The Order had several Invisibility Cloaks at their disposal.” Mundungus certainly refers to multiple cloaks in Order. At the same time, invisibility cloaks are really rare, so it’s highly unlikely they had a whole stockpile of them, certainly not as many as they might want for the war on Voldemort.

Felicity’s suggestion is that it was given to Dumbledore specifically for use of a person planted close by the Potters to take care of them, bring them groceries, etc., and be able to report to Dumbledore that all was well. Arabella Figg is as good an option as any, and probably the best choice – as a squib, she’s be invisible to someone like Voldemort even without a cloak, and it also fits her later appointment at Privet Drive as well.

I’ll say right from the start: I like Felicity’s theory. A lot. It’s more likely than what I’m about to construct, perhaps. I’m not entirely certain it’s “crucial.” It does give us a plausible explanation as to how Dumbledore knew where to find Harry. But let’s do some wild guesswork and see what else we can dig up, again, just for fun.

Wormtail, the Secret Death Eater

What if James gave Dumbledore the cloak, not for that specific reason, but for use in whatever way Dumbledore saw fit. After going into hiding, Wormtail passes the information along to Voldemort.

But why doesn’t Snape know Wormtail is a Death Eater? If Snape knew this, he would have told Dumbledore, who would have warned James and Sirius long ago to stop associating with Pettigrew.

But what if Wormtail is to Voldemort what Snape was to Dumbledore? Wormtail is a secret Death Eater, just as Snape is a secret Order member. It’s a powerful parallel – Snape is what he is to Dumbledore out of loyalty, because of forgiveness; Wormtail is what he is to Voldemort out of fear because of Voldemort’s power. A significant irony that they now co-exist at Spinner’s End!

I see no other way that Snape could be a spy and not know of Wormtail’s association with Voldemort.

The Betrayal

This is where I have to start stretching a bit and where I doubt my own theory; I’d be glad for help here! (Or for you to tell me I’m “barking” – whichever is most appropriate).

I agree with Felicity that Wormtail did not wait until Halloween night to betray the Potters. He gave the information to Voldemort as soon as he could, but we can’t be sure of when this happened. Likely earlier in the week. But how? I submit that Wormtail was using owls to communicate to Voldemort, and that the Potters’ location was given to Voldemort in the same way Harry learned about the location of the Order: on a scrap of parchment.

Halloween
Voldemort begins making plans for the Potters’ deaths, and he concludes that Halloween night is the best night. Even though he knows Dumbledore is not aware of the Potters’ location, he’d have wanted to be absolutely certain Dumbledore was entirely out of the way for that night. He had two reasons, then, for Halloween: (a) he knew the Halloween feast would be taking place at Hogwarts, so Dumbledore would be detained, and (b) he could command Snape to be certain that no matter what, Dumbledore remained at Hogwarts and did not interfere. Voldemort is all too aware of Dumbledore’s “omniscience,” his ability to know things he’s not supposed to know. Snape would insure that Dumbledore stayed at Hogwarts, and if anything funny happened at all, he would rush to Voldemort to let him know.

But if Snape is going to know where to find Voldemort should something go wrong, Snape has to know the Potters’ location as well. Dumbledore has planned to send Snape back into Voldemort’s camp after classes are over on Halloween day; Snape has not been with Voldemort since he was doing his “spy” work at Hogwarts. The next appointed Voldemort-Snape meeting was Halloween evening. Wormtail’s passing of the information occurred in between Voldemort-Snape meetings. Voldemort waited until Snape arrived and showed him the piece of parchment from Wormtail. Given Moody’s insistence that Harry burn the parchment telling of the Order’s location, this seems like a strong possibility.

If, on the other hand, Moody was just being paranoid, and anyone who picked up the parchment couldn’t read it properly, or whatever, because it wasn’t intended for that person, then the solution is simple: Voldemort forced Wormtail to write once again, this time a parchment intended for “my spy at Hogwarts.” OR, Wormtail had told Voldemort face to face, and Voldemort, in order to inform Snape of the location without giving away Wormtail’s identity as secret Death Eater, made him write it on parchment for the Hogwarts spy.

Either way, Snape learns (a) the location of the Potters, and (b) that Voldemort will be going to attack them that very night just hours, or perhaps even less than an hour before Voldemort heads off towards Godric’s Hollow. This also explains how Snape never found out it was Wormtail and naturally thought the letter was from Sirius.
Snape immediately heads back to Hogwarts (disapparating and apparating just outside the grounds) on Voldemort’s orders, but informs Dumbledore of what Voldemort plans to do later that night. Three problems to overcome:

1. Only Snape knows the Potters’ location, and he cannot tell Dumbledore, not being the Secret-Keeper.
2. Snape can’t blow his cover.

What to do? “Go warn the Potters,” Dumbledore commands. “And take the invisibilty cloak. Do not let yourself be seen by Voldemort. Go!”

Snape runs from Hogwarts grounds and disapparates, apparating instantaneously at Godric’s Hollow. There are a few ways this could have gone down:

1. Snape arrives in time to warn the Potters, but leaves immediately, citing Dumbledore’s orders to get out quickly. He leaves before Voldemort arrives just moments – even seconds – later. The Potters, though warned about Dumbledore, have not had enough time to gather everything up and go. Too late.
2. Snape arrives just moments too late. Under the invisibility cloak, he enters the house, sees James dead on the floor, and before he can even think of what to do, he sees the AK flash in another room.
3. Snape arrives to find the house at Godric’s Hollow destroyed and Harry alive and alone, having not made it in time at all.

In whichever instance you prefer, what happened afterwards is the same: Wormtail, hiding in the bushes, gathers up Voldemort’s wand and rushes away, having never known that Snape was there. Snape, perhaps by Patronus message, informs Dumbledore of what has happened.

Those 24 Hours
This is where things get really mysterious, because of a few particulars. Hagrid arrives to pick up Harry “before the Muggles started swarming ’round.” What caused them to swarm? Surely if the destruction of the house had caused the Muggles to stir and head to the house, that leaves a very small window of opportunity for (a) Dumbledore to find out about the Potters’ death and instruct Hagrid to pick up Harry, (b) Hagrid to get there, and (c) the same goes for Sirius finding out and getting there, on a flying motorcycle, no less.

That suggests to me that the Potters’ house was not right in the thick of Godric’s Hollow. Perhaps it’s somewhere on the outskirts of town, or in a wooded area? We can’t know, but we do know that an exploding house would draw attention in any town, so it’s unlikely, given all that happened prior to Harry’s being picked up, that the Muggles were immediately drawn to the house.

And then Hagrid doesn’t meet Dumbledore at Privet Drive until late the next night (Nov. 1), so we have the infamous “missing 24 hours.”

So here’s a potential reconstruction. Dumbledore actually arrives at the Potter’s house before anyone else, because Snape saw it happen and contacted him immediately. Dumbledore began the process of invoking the ancient magic right there in the house’s ruins, took care of Lily and James’s bodies (perhaps he even needed Lily present in order to begin the ancient magic process?), and then contacted Hagrid to go to the house, get Harry, do not let anyone else take him no matter what (because as far as Dumbledore knows, Sirius is the betrayer), and keep him safe and hidden until they meet at 4 Privet Drive the next evening. (The biggest problem here is that Hagrid’s discussion with Dumbledore and McGonagall on that night makes it sound like he picked him up and brought him right over. But that would be quite the plothole, wouldn’t it?)

During those 24 hours, Dumbledore arranges for Mrs. Figg’s move into the neighborhood, invokes the ancient magic over the Dursley house, and then meets Hagrid at 4 Privet Drive.

Why I Like This Theory

Lots of interesting things come of this theory, which would certainly fit the “crucial” category. “Crucial” is a big word. Snape’s loyalty, for example, is “crucial” to the story. It’s gotta be big. This theory explains:

• How Dumbledore got the invisibility cloak directly from James.
• How Hagrid was able to get to Harry so quickly. Snape on the scene set motions in action quickly.
• More about Snape’s loyalty to Dumbledore and Dumbledore’s trust in Snape.
• Why Snape still feels so much rage against James. It’s because it’s rooted in his own guilt. James saved Snape’s life. Snape’s actions while in Voldemort’s service result in putting James’s life in danger, causing his repentance, and a radical turnaround, and yet Snape is unable to save James’ life in return and is even forced to see him die (or just after he died).
• What Dumbledore didn’t tell Harry on the night of the cave. While I agree that Dumbledore’s “Snape was sorry that he had put the Potters in danger” story isn’t enough, I don’t think it’s a lie. I just think there’s much more to it. Snape’s obvious attempts to save the Potters’ lives by going straight to Dumbledore prove Snape’s loyalty, because he could have simply follow the Dark Lord’s orders that night and kept Dumbledore from ever knowing that Voldemort had discovered the location. But can you imagine Dumbledore explaining to Harry that Snape was actually there on the night his parents were killed? Even if Snape couldn’t have done anything about it, Harry would be convinced, especially having just found out that Snape was the snoop.
• Why Snape is the way he is. For Snape it was perhaps the most tragic moment of his life. It buried him in guilt forever. It is why he is the way he is. As far as storytelling goes, a repentant Snape on the scene, trying but failing to save the Potters’ life, is about as tragic as it gets.

Why This Theory is Wrong

It’s a bit complex (though not overly so, maybe). I just wrote it off the top of my head, so there’s bound to be holes. And finally, I wrote it, and I’m no good at the prediction thing.

Back to literary criticism for me.

Related Posts

• No Related Post

“When one wizard saves another wizard’s life, it creates a certain bond between them … and I’m much mistaken if Voldemort wants his servant in the debt of Harry Potter.”
“I don’t want a bond with Pettigrew!” said Harry. “He betrayed my parents!”
“This is magic at its deepest, its most impenetrable, Harry. But trust me … the time may come when you will be very glad you saved Pettigrew’s life.” (Prisoner of Azkaban)

If this isn’t a set-up for something big happening with Pettigrew and Harry in Book 7, I’ll eat the Sorting Hat. There are, in fact, more than this when it comes to these “life debts” in the Harry Potter series. Jeremy Abel has recently compiled a list of them:

1. Harry saved Pettigrew
2. Harry saved Ginny in the Chamber of Secrets
3. Harry saved Arthur when Arthur was attacked by Nagini in the Ministry of Magic
4. Harry saved Ron when he accidentally drank the poison intended for Dumbledore
5. Harry saved Sirius and Hermione from the Dementors
6. James saved Snape from Lupin as a werewolf
7. Snape saved Harry from the curse placed on him by Professor Quirrell during the Quidditch match
8. Snape saved Dumbledore from the curse on Slytherin’s ring
9. Dumbledore saved Harry during his fall from his broom when the Dementors came onto the Quidditch pitch
10. Lilly saved Harry because of her sacrifice which repelled Voldemort’s curse

To this almost complete list, I would add that Snape saved Draco from failing in his mission and the resulting certain death at the hands of Voldemort. One could also say that Dumbledore saved Draco as well, if one believes in Good!Snape (which I do). So those would be #11 (Draco-Snape) and #12 (Draco-Dumbledore). Though not chronological, we’ll use this set of numbers as our point of reference throughout the essay.

Life Debt?

Before examining the specific life debts, we need to ask the question, ”What are we talking about here, in the first place?”  Because the word “debt” really makes this sound awful.  If saving someone’s life results in their being indebted to you in some way that they have to “pay it back,” then it could easily destroy altruism (as one reader at HP Essays put it) and make saving lives a tool to manipulate people.  “Hey, don’t jinx me, man!  Don’t you rememeber you have a life debt to me?”I don’t think it’s best to think of this in that kind of economic way, however.  ”Magic at its deepest, its most impenetrable” is such a manipulative device, and it doesn’t work as an exact cause-and-effect relationship.  I believe that if one really, really wants to, one can ignore the life debt; anything else would be to make love compulsory and ruin the key theme of “choice” in the novels.  In short, a severely calloused person could indeed scoff at someone’s saving their life. 

But the actual magic involved in the saving of a life and creating of the debt seems to me to be the magical opposite of Avada Kedavra, or any other method of killing a person.  When the Killing Curse is thrown or a person is murdered, the murderer’s soul is torn.  It’s the greatest act of evil, and gives way to the potential of horcrux creation, most evil of magic practices. 

On the other hand, the saving of a life (rather than the taking of it), being the exact opposite, is an expression of love and mercy, and hence creates the kind of bond that exists when one person loves another.  It is a practical magical application, so to speak, of Dumbledore’s assertion that love is the most powerful form of magic.  Therefore, we should not think of life debts as the mechanical creation of an almost economic debt, but the bond of love created between the saver and the saved. 

If the saved person was an enemy to begin with, I’d guess that would make the magic both more powerful and more complex, because, as I tried to demonstrate in the essay, “Dumbledore’s Mercy,” evil intentions falter in the face of response of love. 

Which Debts are Plot-Significant?

Now, obviously not all of these are going to be significant, so let’s sort through the list and focus on the ones that will have some kind of significance for Book 7. Numbers 2-5, while significant to the plots of their respective books, will likely have no significance for Book 7, simply because Hermione, the Weasleys, and Harry are all so loyal to each other already that saving each other’s lives is just part of what they do. The “life debt” created only increases the strong bond that already existed between them. Same goes for #9 – Harry is already loyal to Dumbledore. Number 10, Lily’s sacrifice for Harry, has already been exceedingly significant, and I’m assuming will continue to be so, but we already know how, and once again, a positive mother-son bond would have already existed.

That leaves us with Harry’s saving Pettigrew (#1), James’ saving Snape (#6), Snape’s saving Harry (#7), Dumbledore (#8), and Draco (#11), and Dumbledore’s saving Draco (#12). For my own purposes, being on the “Good Snape” side, Snape saving Draco and Dumbledore saving Draco amount to about the same thing, but let’s quickly consider a Draco-Dumbledore debt if Snape is evil before moving on.

The Draco-Dumbledore Debt (#12)
Even if Snape turns out to be evil, I think it can be argued that Dumbledore had every intention of saving Draco Malfoy, and that his actions and words on the night of his death put Draco in his debt. (See my essay, “Dumbledore’s Mercy“). Now the question will be asked, “What does it matter if you are in the debt of a dead man?” A fair question. But loyalty to Dumbledore has a lot of power, doesn’t it? Dumbledore’s belief that he will only truly be gone when no one who is left is loyal to him has proved true. It’s actually part of the whole point of Half-Blood Prince that Rowling establish Harry’s undying loyalty to Dumbledore. A Draco Malfoy with a life debt to Dumbledore in the service of Lord Voldemort is another strike against the Dark Lord any way you cut it. What would be so significant about this particular debt is that, unlike the Wormtail-Harry debt, Voldemort would not actually know about the Draco-Dumbledore debt. Dumbledore told Draco that he “expects” Draco to die in the attempt on Dumbledore’s life. In short, Voldemort is foolish enough (this is his greatest weakeness!) to believe that Dumbledore, faced with the prospect of his own death, would take the life of his would-be killer (even though it’s his own student) than to submit to death. And no one ever need know about Draco’s conversation with Dumbledore or his hesitancy to kill him.

Would Evil!Snape tell Voldemort that Draco faultered so badly? I doubt it. Even if Snape is evil, we see some sort of bond between him and Narcissa, and the Unbreakable Vow (UV) was put in place to protect Draco from Voldemort’s wrath. I doubt even an Evil!Snape would run back to Voldemort and say, “Even though the task is completed, you should kill Draco because he faltered.”

But the point is moot, because Snape is good, and here’s why.

The Snape Debts (#6, 7, 8, 11)
Snape saves three people in the course of the series, so we’ll take them one by one.

The Dumbledore-Snape Debt (#8)
While Dumbledore is no longer in the debt of Snape, being dead now, the creation of the debt is quite significant. Jeremy observes and asks in the post I quoted above:

The Snape-Dumbledore saving relationship is interesting, though I’m not sure of its significance. Does it bear on the good, bad, or conflicted Snape question?

Indeed, it does. In the first place, one has to wonder why, if Snape is evil, he would have saved Dumbledore’s life after the Ringcrux caper. Perhaps we could posit a situation in which Dumbledore would have had the capacity to blow Snape’s spy cover if Snape refused to heal him. But let’s think about the situation. Dumbledore makes it back from destroying the Ringcrux, barely alive. Surely Albus doesn’t want anyone to know where he’s been or what he’s been doing, so he goes to Snape, and Snape alone. This is the perfect opportunity for Evil!Snape to do away with the Dark Lord’s greatest enemy without anyone knowing about it. Why not take it? He wouldn’t blow his cover at Hogwarts by allowing Dumbledore to die and creating an easily believable story that Dumbledore showed up on his doorstep and died just as he crossed it. Even if the Ringrux was destroyed at some point after the Narcissa-Snape UV was made, Snape could only see this as the perfect opportunity to save Draco by bypassing the whole scheme and allowing Dumbledore to die in his presence. It would have been the perfect murder. There would be no disadvantages, as far as I can see, if ending the problem of Dumbledore right then and there.

This doesn’t entirely eliminate the Conflicted!Snape theory, which posits a Snape who waffled back and forth, especially after the Dark Lord’s return, and chose the Dark Side on the Astronomy Tower, but it makes the theory more unlikely. If Snape were loyal enough to Dumbledore over the summer to save his life when he was on death’s doorstep, what could possibly have changed over the course of the schoolyear to cause such a drastic shift in Severus as to make him to to exact opposite of saving Dumbledore’s life? A year teaching Defense Against the Dark Arts? No way. If spending regular time in the presence of Voldemort doesn’t sway one to the Dark Side, teaching a bunch of teenagers how to cast nonverbal spells isn’t going to do it.

The Snape-Dumbledore debt is definitely a point in favor of Good!Snape.

The Harry-Snape Debt (#7)

Harry’s hatred for Snape is perhaps even greater than his hatred for Voldemort at the end of HBP. One can hardly imagine Harry running into Snape two days after the close fo HBP and not mustering up all the hatred he can for his first attempt at a Killing Curse.

But it’s interesting to consider that it was just after the revelation of Pettigrew’s being responsible for his parents’ death that he chose to have mercy on him. If ever there were a time that Harry would be raging mad and make a rash decision, that would have been it. At this point a couple of things need to be considered.

Snape most definitely and deliberately saved Harry’s life in Philosopher’s Stone when Quirrell was trying to curse him. Whether Snape’s explanation to Bellatrix at Spinner’s End was a lie or not, the fact remains: Harry would be dead if not for Snape. Hence, the creation of that Life Debt. The Life Debt is “magic at its deepest, its most impenetrable.” If this is really the case, and we have no reason to doubt Dumbledore’s wisdom on this, then Harry may just find it much more difficult than he imagined to conjure up enough reason to attempt to kill Snape. The bond created when Snape saved Harry might be the trick to stay Harry’s wand long enough for Snape to get his full story explained.

Of course, if Snape really is evil, then Harry’s being indebted to him might make it all the more difficult for Harry to fight Snape, should the chance arise again (could it have even been why he was unable to be effective against Snape at the end of HBP?).

The Snape-James Debt (#6)
The Snape-James debt must be taken into account simultaneously with the Harry-Snape debt. A few points are important, and a few questions must be asked. First, in what way does the James-Snape debt affect Snape’s relationship with Harry? Emotionally, Snape obviously hated James and so hates Harry. He attempts to cover up this debt by raging at Harry about how James saved him from Sirius’s cruel joke in the first place, so it wasn’t much of a “saving.” The fact remains, of course, that Snape was in James’s debt.

Here’s a question to which we do not have a clear answer, as far as I know: Can the debt be repaid, so that one is no longer in the other’s debt? To apply it specifically, when Snape saved Harry’s life, did that fulfill his debt to James, so that the debt is now cancelled? We don’t know for sure. Snape continues to hate Harry in either case, but if the debt is ongoing, will it affect Snape’s loyalties? Does it inform how we should think about Snape’s loyalties at the present? Since we can’t know the long-term nature of a life debt, we really can’t speculate too far about these things.
But here’s where this debt becomes significant for Book 7. Besides Dumbledore, who’s the one person Harry wants to be most like? His dad. When it comes right down to it, it was because he wanted to be like his dad that he spared Pettigrew.

And his dad saved Snape. This might be additional incentive for Harry to reconsider Snape in Book 7 – or at least, as with the Harry-Snape debt above, cause Harry to pause from attempting to kill him just long enough to hear Snape out.

Let’s take a brief break from canonical facts to speculate about how this might play out. Here comes some guesswork.

Imagine a confrontation between Harry and Snape, maybe similar to the one with Sirius at the end of PoA.* Harry has Snape where he wants him, perhaps with the help of Ron and Hermione, and the time has finally come for him to avenge Dumbledore’s death. Snape is trapped and disarmed. But something is holding Harry back. Two things simultaneously, in fact: (1) Snape saved his life in his first year at Hogwarts, and even if Harry can’t place this exactly in his mind, it’s keeping him from being able to pull the trigger; and (2) Harry remembers that his dad saved Snape. With Snape at wandpoint and unable to move, Harry decides to let Snape have his say. Severus explains all about his loyalty to Dumbledore, why he turned from being a Death Eater, what his connection was to Harry’s parents, and what really happened on the Astronomy Tower (un-stoppering Dumbledore’s death).

Then just for fun, consider that Harry doesn’t believe Snape. The only two people in the world who can be rightfully called “Dumbledore’s man through and through” face each other, battling each other over the same point: loyalty to Dumbledore. As Harry loses his temper and finally decides to kill Snape, the powerful loyalty being expressed by each side calls to the scene the only remaining character who can resolve this tension: Fawkes the Phoenix. In the same way the Fawkes came to Harry’s rescue in the Chamber, he comes to Snape’s rescue, hovering in between Harry and Snape, or even landing on the fallen Snape, ready to swallow anything Harry throws at Snape. And Harry finally believes.**

Possible? Perhaps. I think it’s a fairly good guess based on the Life Debts as they stand.

A final note on the James-Snape debt. We’ve been given what is considered by most fans an insufficient explanation from Dumbledore concerning the reason for Snape’s repentance:

‘Professor Snape made a terrible mistake. He was still in Lord Voldemort’s employ on the night he heard the first half of Professor Trelawney’s prophecy. Naturally, he hastened to tell his master what he had heard, for it concerned his master most deeply. But he did not know – he had no possible way of knowing – which boy Voldemort would hunt from then onwards, or that the parents he would destroy in his murderous quest were people that Professor Snape knew, that they were your mother and father -’

Harry let out a yell of mirthless laughter.

‘He hated my dad like he hated Sirius! Haven’t you noticed, Professor, how the people Snape hates tend to end up dead?’

‘You have no idea of the remorse Professor Snape felt when he realized how Lord Voldemort had interpreted the prophecy, Harry. I believe it to be the greatest regret of his life and the reason that he returned -’

‘But he’s a very good Occlumens, isn’t he, sir?’ said Harry, whose voice was shaking with the effort of keeping it steady. ‘And isn’t Voldemort convinced that Snape’s on his side, even now? Professor … how can you be sure Snape’s on our side?’

Dumbledore did not speak for a moment; he looked as though he was trying to make up his mind about something. At last he said, ‘I am sure. I trust Severus Snape completely.’ (HBP-25)

I agree the explanation is not sufficient, primarily because of the “moment” in which Dumbledore was considering whether to explain more to Harry. But quite frankly, we’ve no idea what was going on in Dumbledore’s mind and whether or not it had anything to do with what was just said about the Potters. For all we know, the answer to why Dumbledore trusts Snape so much might lie in some Snape-Dumbledore connection we don’t know about. Some have speculated that Snape harbored a secret, unrequited love for Lily Evans (which might explain even better Snape’s revulsion of James).

But what Dumbledore has given us may not be as weak an answer as most people think. Again, let’s observe that Dumbledore describes the Life Debt magic as “magic at its deepest, its most impenetrable.” We’re talking about magic every bit as powerful as Lily’s sacrifice that saved Harry. If this is really the case, is it that difficult to believe that young Snape, in the debt of James Potter, fell apart and came to his senses when he became responsible for the murder of the one who, just a few years prior, had saved his life? I don’t think Dumbledore is exaggerating when he speaks of Snape’s “remorse” and it being his “greatest regret.”

The Draco-Snape Debt (#11)

Assuming once again a Good!Snape, nothing could be better for Draco Malfoy than to be (a) in Snape’s debt and (b) under Snape’s care and protection as HBP ends. For more on this, see my recent essay, “Dumbledore’s Mercy.” The rest of the implications for the Draco-Snape debt fit in nicely with the Wormtail-Harry debt, so let’s think about that one now.

The Wormtail-Harry Debt (#1)

Finally, we have what is about to be the key life debt of the series, because it’s been clearly mentioned as significant by Dumbledore. How so? Again, we enter the realm of wild guesswork. [I don't think it's a "guess" that Wormtail will turn on Voldemort in favor of Harry before the end of Book 7. But how it will happen is where we don't have much to go on.] We could speculate all sorts of dramatic scenarios in which Wormtail turns on Lord Voldemort, much to his surprise.

But I don’t know if Voldemort would be so surprised at a Wormtail turnaround. He already distrusts Wormtail, and is suspicious at the beginning of GoF that Wormtail is trying to protect Harry (“not use the boy” GoF-1). What is really interesting is the Snape/Wormtail pairing at Spinner’s End. I think it’s best to assume that Voldemort, to some extent, distrusts both Snape and Wormtail. He distrusts everybody in the first place, but with Snape under the employ of that “muggle-lover” Dumbledore for all those years, and Wormtail in Harry’s debt, Voldemort would be quite keen to make sure neither of them turn on him. So he’s created an atmosphere of suspicion and spying at Spinner’s End.

Now Snape has fled, having fulfilled the Unbreakable Vow, un-stoppering Dumbledore’s death according to plan, and taken Draco with him. It’s a likely possibility that he’ll take Draco with him back to Spinner’s End before anywhere else; it might even be possible that Draco will stay there with him for a while. And maybe Narcissa as well? After all, Narcissa is afraid of the Dark Lord’s anger, and Snape has already protected her family once by taking and fulfilling the vow.

In any case, assuming Good!Snape theories are correct, consider the three people who are now under the employ of Lord Voldemort, who are in various ways vitally connected to each other and to Harry:

1. Wormtail, living with Snape and owing a Life Debt to Harry
2. Snape, ultimately loyal to Dumbledore and continuing his job on his orders
3. Draco, indebted now to Snape and Dumbledore, afraid of Voldemort and having just been offered sanctuary by Dumbledore

They don’t have to all be living at Spinner’s End – placing the Malfoys there would just be a matter of convenience. Now consider: There is simply no way Dumbledore put his plan into motion without charging Snape to do everything he could to save Draco. It may have even been part of their communication by legilimency on the Tower that night. So we should assume that Snape, when the time is right, will extend Dumbledore’s offer of mercy to Draco once again. That means, there are at least three “Death Eaters” (assuming Malfoy either was one already or will become one) who could potentially turn on Voldemort from within. Any way you look at it, that’s problematic for Lord Voldemort, especially if all three of them agree to team up before it’s over (unlikely, but possible).

Wild guesswork aside, now, Wormtail’s Life Debt to Harry will bring out a couple of interesting things.

• Why in the world did cowardly Wormtail get placed in Gryffindor? We should expect an act of bravery worthy of a Gryffindor before the end, and his “Life Debt” is going to be the key. I would not at all be surprised by a Wormtail sacrificial death (though, if I were forced to guess which character got the “reprieve” Rowling referred to, I’d guess Pettigrew).
• Redemption is a key theme in the book, and the redemption of the one who betrayed Harry’s parents would be a dramatic and poignant plot turn.

Conclusion

The regular caveats about my “wild guesswork” in place, I think it’s fair to say that Life Debts will play a very significant role in Book 7. It’s unlikely that the actual “life debt” magic will be referenced in every case (we’ll probably hear about it again only in Wormtail’s case), but expect Rowling to be working that magic behind the scenes throughout the course of the novel.

Endnotes
*This is a situation I read Joyce Odell [Red Hen] posit to set up her big “Dumbledore is alive” reveal, before JKR smashed that theory to bits.
**I do not know who first came up with the idea of Fawkes being the one who settles this conflict. I’ve read the idea in several places now.

Related Posts

• No Related Post