A Yahoo! article indicates that a legal action filed in England is claiming that J.K. Rowling copied significant portions of Goblet of Fire from a 1987 children’s book written by Adrian Jacobs, called Willy the Wizard.
It named the estate’s trustee as Paul Allen, and said that Rowling had copied “substantial parts” of “The Adventures of Willy the Wizard — No 1 Livid Land” written by Jacobs in 1987.
It added that the plot of Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire copied elements of the plot of Willy the Wizard, including a wizard contest, and that the Potter series borrowed the idea of wizards traveling on trains.
“Both Willy and Harry are required to work out the exact nature of the main task of the contest which they both achieve in a bathroom assisted by clues from helpers, in order to discover how to rescue human hostages imprisoned by a community of half-human, half-animal fantasy creatures,” the estate statement said. [click to continue…]
by Dave
Update: I edited this post for some grammatical mistakes. Sorry…I was in a bit of a hurry yesterday when I wrote it.
Jamie and I subscribe to Entertainment Weekly, my favorite section of which is Stephen King’s monthly column in the back of the magazine. While the magazine certainly isn’t especially critically aware or anything, their latest issue lists what they believe are the “new classics” of film, television, books, and videogames. “New Classics” basically translates into the best examples from these genres over the last 25 years. You can check out the book list here, and there are links to look at the other lists, too.
I bring this up because HP made the list — once. One of the books is slotted at #2 on a list of 100, the only one to make it. That book? Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire. The print version of the magazine has a brief commentary that praises the book’s turn from the tamer, more child oriented direction of the first three novels. Interestingly, the book sits right between Cormac McCarthy (#1) and Toni Morrison (#3), and is more than twenty places higher than Possession by HP nemesis A.S. Byatt (which is a fantastic book, whatever you may think of Byatt’s take on HP). She also sits well above a very long list of distinguished authors that have won everything from Pulitzer Prizes to National Book Awards.
But, Goblet of Fire? Really?
Instead of posting a plothole, this time I’m going to try to solve one. I only had one minor gripe with PoA (having to do with butterbeer), so we’re on to GoF. The biggest plothole that folks have mentioned from GoF is the use of the Triwizard Cup by Faux Moody as the portkey as Harry’s invite to Lord Thingy’s second birthday party. Why such a complicated process? Why wait so long? Why chance Harry not being the one to touch it? Why couldn’t Crouch, Jr. have just passed him something in a little office chat at some point earlier in the year?Â
Well, obviously the book wouldn’t have been anywhere near as long, so it could have simply been a plot necessity. But I’m going to make some suggestions that might help us make more sense of it.Â
Voldemort’s Power: While Wormtail suggested that they could use someone other than Harry and get the thing done with a lot quicker, it is rather evident that Baby-mort was gaining power throughout the course of the book. The Dark Mark tattoos kept getting clearer throughout, as we heard from both Karkarov and Snape. Frequent mentions were made about Dumbledore “reading the signs.” It seems a reasonable explanation that Voldemort wanted to wait long enough to achieve a certain amount of regained strength, even in his defeated form, before the re-birth occurred. We have no idea what kind of magic took place in that cauldron, but it might indeed be a process that could have failed had Babymort not been strong enough.
Voldemort’s Planning: Voldemort is very patient and cunning. As the symbol of pure evil in the series, it’s likely that we can draw some parallels between him and the current world threat of terrorism, which also embodies one of the clearest forms of present-day evil. And we know terrorists are patient and cunning. They are willing to wait as long as it takes to make sure their plans go correctly.Â
As such, it would also make sense for Harry to grasp a portkey at a time when it would not be noticed that he was missing. Were Harry expected in a class, at lunch, or back in the common room after an office meeting with Faux Moody, people would have noticed he was missing. At the Third Task, however, no one had any idea how long it would take the champions to find the cup. The whole plan moved him at significant distance from Dumbledore and the rest of the school, ironically, during the very time that they were most aware of Harry’s absence!
Crafty fella, that Voldemort.
Rowling and Bloomsbury Accused of Plagiarism
by Dave the Longwinded on June 15, 2009
A Yahoo! article indicates that a legal action filed in England is claiming that J.K. Rowling copied significant portions of Goblet of Fire from a 1987 children’s book written by Adrian Jacobs, called Willy the Wizard.
{ 18 comments }