Ever since the discovery of the 2000 Rowling quote about getting “close to the dead,” two primary trajectories of speculation have been on the table: (1) that she was referring to the veil (2) that it’s a reference to Cathy Liesner’s “Stoppered Death” theory.
What if it’s both?
Let’s revisit the quote again:
“That’s a given. Without it [the irreversible nature of death] the plot would fall apart, though in Book Seven you’ll see just how close you can get to the dead. You can be brought back from being petrified and from injuries that in the real world are mortal, depending on the degree of skill that a particular wizard possesses. You can’t go to any wizard and say ‘Will you cure my terminally ill relative?’ It’s a mirror image of the real world in that sense.â€
Getting “close to the dead” certainly sounds a lot more like the veil theories – actual proximity to dead people. But the follow-up explanatory statement doesn’t fit that, does it? The immediately subsequent statement is clearly a reference to Dumbledore’s state in HBP (so we know she had that part planned out way back in 2000!).
A couple points to mention:
- Dumbledore is “definitely dead;” He won’t “do a Gandalf.” I still think this is pretty strong evidence of no Dumbledore return for DH.
- Dumbledore was giving Rowling trouble in the writing of Deathly Hallows – which means Book 7 will contain some crucial Dumbledore elements, even though he will not personally show up in the book as a living character.
What if being in a Stoppered Death state allows one some level of access to the dead that other people don’t have? I mean, getting “close to the dead” is no big deal in the Harry Potter world: there are ghosts everywhere. Everyone gets “close to the dead” at some point. But with Rowling’s follow-up statement that most certainly seems to be evidence for a Stoppered Death, there may be a link between being in that state of existence and getting “close to the dead.”
Now: Aside from looking for the Cave, we don’t know for certain where Dumbledore went during his long departures from the school. Dumbledore can become invisible without a cloak, which means he can easily slip in and out of the Ministry undetected. What if being in a Stoppered Death state allowed Dumbledore the ability to pass through the veil and return?
It would fit the thematic elements of the story, as well as the parallels to Greek mythology (the trio’s descent past Fluffy/Cerberus in Book 1, for example). Think Odysseus, of course. What if Dumbledore is the one character in the series who, while not being able to be resurrected from the dead, was temporarily in a state in which he could pass in and out of “the Underworld” without harm? What if Dumbledore, at some point during the goings-on of HBP, made a mythological journey to the Underworld through the veil?
This could have a lot of implications for what kinds of memories and information Dumbledore has gathered and has left for Harry.
Thoughts?
Note: I addressed this quote in the pubcast, which will be uploaded tonight, but I didn’t have this idea about it being both until after I had finished recording.








{ 1 trackback }
{ 9 comments… read them below or add one }
Well that’s interesting.
It would take care of the necessary elements.
I wonder what Dumbledore was doing on the other side of the veil? He wasn’t collecting memories, he only got them from alive people. Was he getting advice from the Hogwarts founders? Said “Suck eggs!” to Grindlewald? Were pieces of Voldemorts soul that had been in the destroyed horcruxes already on the other side?
Matthew
“Close to Death†reminds me of the research of Raymond A. Moody about near-death experiences, fear of death and afterlife. The foreword of his book “Life after Life†was written by Elisabeth Kübler-Ross, to whom (as seriously_black pointed at in another thread) JKR referred in that famous interview when speaking of the “five stages of grief†and helping us to “get past denial†of Dumbledore’s death. So she could well be acquainted with Moody’s work as well. He also offers a technique of “mirror gazing†to get in contact with departed loved ones.
I wonder if this could lead to something.
Well, Travis, it is an interesting idea. But as we agreed earlier, it was probably not a case of going repeatedly through the veil at the Ministry of Magic. I think going through the veil has to be a unique experience. As does coming back out. Otherwise it becomes trivialized. I think that particular experience will be reserved for Harry.
I would be more inclined to think that if Dumbledore was in some kind of mid-way state between life and death, he’d be more aware of the spirits of the dead, but he wouldn’t be holding interviews, as it were.
What is also interesting to me is the nature of the connection between the Headmasters and the Founders of Hogwarts. Is there some special bond, or affinity or way of communicating?
I do think, btw, that Dumbledore had more knowledge than he could impart to Harry. How that’s going to be passed on will probably form a big part of the plot of book 7. Because to my mind, the back and forth between the living and the dead has to have a purpose, and I can see two purposes: for Dumbledore to pass to Harry knowledge he didn’t have time to share before his death; or for Harry to get knowledge which he needs to defeat Voldemort from the Founders.
Which brings me back to JKR’s statement about DD giving her trouble in book 7. If we assume that DD has knowledge he needs to share with Harry, his memory trace (whether it’s at the end of Snape’s wand or in his portrait) can’t pass it on. So Harry would have to seek out his spirit. But at the same time, he would be interacting with his memory trace in the portrait. So there will potentially be two Dumbledores to write.
Interesting dilemma.
Personally, I don’t think Harry will go seeking knowledge from the spirit world. I think that this is against the Christian world-view that Rowling has been presenting. It sounds too much like Saul and Johnathan. Harry may have to travel there or be transported there to perform a task, and it will be enlightening to him, but I doubt the purpose will be just to communicate with someone.
Matthew
Well… about what JKRowling said about Dumbledore giving her trouble, we all are thinking about Albus Dumbledore, and maybe its Aberforth the one that is getting to do something in the story, he is also Dumbledore…
Lawtrix, I’m rather sure Aberforth will have a role to play in DH. The quote in context, however, must be a reference to Albus, ’cause Radcliffe said, “I thought he was dead,” to which Rowling responded, “Yeah, but it’s more complicated than that” (rough paraphrase). It’s not like she’s kept it a big secret that Aberforth is a Dumbledore, so I don’t think she was just evading his reference to Albus.
Didn’t JKR say that we would find something out about that broken mirror that Sirius supposedly had with him when he went through the veil? Maybe Harry will be in contact with Sirius in some way. Maybe that is what JKR is refering to when she comments on how close you can get to the dead. I’m still waiting for the explanation of Sirius’s mysterious death through the veil.
I don’t think he has been through the veil because he refers to the fact that he unfortunately didn’t get certain information out of people before they died and then had to run on guesswork.
Good point, Corey.
IF there’s going to be an Underworld/through the veil scene, I’m more inclined to think it’ll be Harry in Book 7, rather than Dumbledore in HBP (despite my initial theory here).