An Introduction
Do you remember the first time as a child that you read a story that fascinated you? A book that caught your imagination and took you out of yourself, out of your chair, into another world? And when at last you reluctantly put the story aside, you could hardly believe any time had passed.
For me, that story was by George MacDonald. He’s not as well known now as he should be, but George MacDonald was a Scot who wrote poems and novels and sermons and some of the finest children’s stories of the 19th century. The stories I found first were his fairy tales.
When I say ‘fairy tales,’ I don’t mean the usual handsome-prince-saves-helpless-princess tales we usually see these days. I mean fairy tales that strange and haunting and amazing and, to use the Scots, unco.
Stories like ‘The Day Boy and the Night Girl,’ about a witch who wants to create the perfect, masculine boy and the perfect, feminine girl. So she raises a boy who never sees the dark, and a girl who never sees the light. And the story is about what happens when the Night Girl sees the Day Boy sees the dark for the first time, and what happens when they meet each other.
Stories like ‘The Wow ‘o Rivven,’ about an old man with mental illness, and the young woman who becomes his friend—how she learns how to listen to the great bell in the ruined church, and how she begins to realise that the bell is calling to her.
Stories like ‘The Shadows,’ full of strange, shadow-creatures that visit Ralph Rinkelmann—a humorist and poet who also happens to be the King of Fairyland.
Once you’ve read these stories, you never forget them.
MacDonald, in the heart the Victorian era, used these stories and many more like them to explore questions that are nearly taboo in children’s literature today—questions about mortality, and suffering, and sexuality, and death. Unlike many authors, he doesn’t address these subjects as if he, the wise grown-up, could lecture foolish children about What They Need to Know. Rather, he takes his readers on an adventure—parents and children alike—and it’s only after the adventure is over, when the tale all told and the last songs sung, that the questions appear in the imagination, lingering and growing like the finish of a fine wine.
George MacDonald can be read—and has been read—in many ways. Do you want a Victorian novelist? His novel Robert Falconer was Queen Victoria’s favourite, no less. She gave copies to all the grandchildren one year. A Romantic? MacDonald admired Coleridge, Shelly, and Wordsworth, and wrote poems and prose that sound very much like they wrote it. A mystic poet? The Diary of an Old Soul carries on the metaphysical tradition and competes with the best of Blake as the greatest spiritual verse of the 19th century. A Christian teacher? I direct you to three volumes of Unspoken Sermons. A fantasist? It can be argued that literary fantasy as we know it today began when a young C. S. Lewis discovered the Everyman edition of Phantastes, when a young J. R. R. Tolkien read The Princess and the Goblin.
And that’s not even close to the half of it.
MacDonald was, in fact, all of these things and none of these things. He was that most fragile and chaotic of miracles: an individual. He loved his wife and children deeply, suffered ill-health, nearly lost his faith in God after a harrowing stint as a minister. He wrote and explored many different ways of expression, and genres, and ideas. His thoughts and interests developed and changed.
All the while, he wrote—wrote, wrote, and wrote. His stories and poems emerge from the shadows of struggle; his sermons and essays emerge from the light of conviction. Everything together appeared from the deep hope that characterised MacDonald’s life.
That brings us back to the fairy tales. There are dozens of ways of looking at any author, and any individual. But I want to introduce you to George MacDonald. So I want you to meet him the way I met him—reading his fairy tales. Reading his children’s stories.
Over the coming weeks, we’ll be discussing these stories here, teasing out the strange unsettling questions they ask us, and trying to see if we start discovering together why so many people—like Neil Gaiman, C. S. Lewis, possibly J. K. Rowling, and generations of parents and children—have looked to MacDonald as their inspiration, as a teller of tales and weaver of wonders.
Because that, at least, MacDonald certainly was. He wrote in his essay ‘The Fantastic Imagination’ (1893):
If a writer’s aim be logical conviction, he must spare no logical pains, not merely to be understood, but to escape being misunderstood; where his object is to move by suggestion, to cause to imagine, then let him assail the soul of his reader as the wind assails an aeolian harp. If there be music in my reader, I would gladly wake it. Let fairytale of mine go for a firefly that now flashes, now is dark, but may flash again. [...]
The best way with music, I imagine, is not to bring the forces of our intellect to bear upon it, but to be still and let it work on that part of us for whose sake it exists. [...]
If any strain of my “broken music” makes a child’s eyes flash, or his mother’s for a moment grow dim, my labour will not have been in vain.
Come with me a for a whole, back to where a small boy sits with his mother as they read together a story about a little girl and a little boy, who found the treasure at the end of the rainbow and wander together to find the country from where the shadows fall…
Come with me, and you will see MacDonald did not labour in vain.
This is nothing if not a conversation—questions, comments, additions, and curiosities always welcome.


{ 21 comments… read them below or add one }
I must find some of those stories. I grew up with the Curdie books, and The Light Princess, and At The Back of The North Wind: and I’ve read Phantastes and Litith (the former more memorable than the latter, to mind) and I agree he was an extraordinary imagination. (Not a very good poet except in prose. )
“The Curdie books” — are those the same ones, then, which Jane Studdock was discussing with the Director in That Hideous Strength?
I confess, I never read McDonald. I thought he was too heady for me, because he was the Great Influencer. But after that intro, I’m ready to dive in. He sounds more doable now. Thanks Mr. Pond.
By strange coincidence, someone who knows how much I love Harry Potter just recommended to me today that I read MacDonald’s The Golden Key…. Thank you, Mr. Pond for this heartfelt and lovely introduction to this author!
Oooh, where are we starting?
I read the second Curdie book but not the first, I’m afraid (I didn’t know what order they went in.)
Great post! I’m looking forward to reading some MacDonald with you all.
Some of the first books I remember truly *loving* are Narnia, The Phantom Tollbooth, Eight Cousins (Alcott), and Julie of the Wolves (I’m not a survival story devotee, but loved how Julie observed and learned to communicate with the wolves… and I ended up studying linguistics, so maybe this book awoke the inner linguist in me?).
Steve, once you know MacDonald, it’s great fun to revisit C. S. Lewis and play “Count the MacDonald Allusions.” He wasn’t kidding when he said “I fancy I have never written a book in which I did not quote from him.” (The Great Divorce is a freebie, since a fictional version of MacDonald is a key character.)
Though it’s a bit unfair to GMD, as PotterMom05 remarked, that he’s usually seen these days as “The Great Influencer.” Yes, his impact was profound and lasting, but his work stands just fine on its own merits.
For the record, his poetry is seriously underrated. Yes, some of it is a bit clumsy, but when he’s at top form he’s in a league with Blake. And he makes for some very lovely song cycles and choral settings.
I should probably read more MacDonald because when I read Lewis I play “Count the Nesbit Allusions.”
Katherine, welcome! Yes, do read more MacDonald. All of his works have been reprinted, and his children’s stories have been more or less continually in print anyhow. I do feel that I need to stick up for his poetry, though; it’s needed a reassessment for a long time and is hopefully getting it. You have moments of awfulness, sure–but if he’s never as good as Wordsworth, he’s never as bad as Wordsworth, either. There are moments of sheer genius in his longer, more neglected works, and his nonsense verse approaches Lear’s zenith. So, for what it’s worth.
Steve–yes. The very same. I’ll just point out that CSL’s employment of the Chapel Perilous archetype and bearded, ailing Fisher-King living only on bread and wine is, in fact, a blatantly conscious and metafictive borrowing from the king in The Princess and Curdie. CSL is very aware of that, and even gives us the Curdie reference so we get it. As T. S. Eliot said, never imitate; if you must, steal.
PotterMom, cbiondi, and Melody–Thanks, one and all! That’s brilliant. I think some MacDonald is more accessible than some Lewis, in fact (although Lilith–a widely misunderstood text–is about as accessible as Blake…). And, dare I even say it , his stories tend to be more challenging and spiritually profound that Rowling’s. I’ll look forward to discussing him with you.
Chris–we’re starting with ‘The Shadows’ next week. It’s MacDonald’s first fairy tale–predating Phantastes, despite popular confusion–one of his strangest and one of his best.
Eric–Well said. You seriously need to get into GMD’s longer poems, too; The Diary of an Old Soul is imperative, and certainly Within and Without.
revgeorge–yeah, the way I see it, everyone should read more MacDonald. Always, all the time. Even me! He’s such a delight to read. You might want to look at The Miracles of Our Lord; not a story, of course, but tremendous New Testament exposition.
Great thoughts, Mr. Pond! I grew up with MacDonald’s Wee Sir Gibbie of the Highlands and Alec Forbes of Howglen; later, I got around to many more of his novels and a few of his fairy tales. My most recent read was At the Back of the North Wind.
I loved your description of MacDonald as an individual. Perhaps those things are what makes his tales so relatable.
So are we doing a read-through? or should I just pick something?
Thanks, Jenna. Perhaps they are. Certainly they’re part of it.
PotterMom–we’re not exactly doing a read-through. I’ll be discussing individual works in each post, but I’ll be assuming that either it’s not a work folks are familiar with, or not something they’ve read recently. It’s sort of introducing the stories; at the very least, I’ll have done what I wanted to do if it makes you go read the stories afterward. So, start wherever catches your fancy–that’s how I’ll be choosing what to post on!
But for a head start, you can read my story of choice for next week here: ‘The Shadows.’
There are two stories at the link: Cross Purposes and The Shadows. I didn’t realize this so I ended up reading Cross Purposes. MacDonald isn’t into happily ever after, is he? Or maybe not in the traditional way.
Mr Pond, thank you so much for getting this project started. A brilliant introduction! I think we need to get a fire started here in the pub, grab some fine ales, and sit around for George MacDonald story time.
I’m really looking forward to this. My exposure to MacDonald has been limited – Golden Key, the Curdie books, The Light Princess, Phantastes, The Giant’s Heart, and a few other stories and poems.
For those who like audiobooks, Lizzie Driver does a nice amateur reading of them, which you can find for free at Librivox.org.
Just finished reading The Shadows
Will be interested in reading what you say about it, Mr. P
Just thought people here would like to know – over at Tor.com blogs, Mari Ness is also starting a series of Macdonald re-reads.
Thank you Mr Pond for that wonderful intro into MacDonald. I regrettably have not heard of him before nor of any of the stories and poems mentioned here. But I certainly will be learning of him as you’ve got me ready to read The Shadows. I am very excited for a bit of new reading!
You’re very welcome, Jen. I’m going to try to get another one of these up shortly, so stay tuned.
Steve Morrison: I call shotgun!
I just finished reading The Shadows and what a wonderful story. Full of so many feelings and emotions and regrets and laughs. Well done.
I appreciate your article and encouraging others to discover MacDonald. I found the two book set The Child Christ and other short stories, and enjoyed all but LOVED many of them, such as The Light Princess, Photogen and Nycteris, The Cruel Painter, and The Wise Woman or the Lost Princess. These led me to Phantastes and Lilith, The Back of the North Wind, and the Curdie and the Goblin books. I have not tried to read his Victorian novels ( I don’t particularly like Dickens either as a read ) but I’ll bet their stories are compelling, as I’ve found everything else I’ve read from him.
Since I”m reading the “Princess & Goblin” I will give you a quote or two from there….
“Regardless of the fact that we were the first possessors of the regions they now inhabit, . . . they look upon us as a degraded race, and make a mockery of all our finer feelings. But the time has almost arrived when — thanks to His Majesty’s inventive genius — it will be in our power to take a thorough revenge upon them once for all, in respect of their unfriendly behavior.”
“Should His Majesty fail — which who shall dare even to imagine in his most secret thoughts? –then will be the time for carrying out with rigour the design to which Glump referred, and for which our preparations are even now all but completed. The failure of the former will render the latter imperative.”
{ 1 trackback }