Is Voldemort Undead? or How to Lick a Lich

by korg20000bc on August 23, 2009

covnecromancy03lich2wdAfter some recent discussion I thought that I’d post about something that I’ve been thinking about since the end of Chamber of Secrets i.e. that Voldemort is a Lich-  a powerful wizard or magician who keeps themselves from destruction by hiding their soul in powerful magic items- though they must die to achieve this.

The word lich (lych) is  Old English for corpse and is a good visual description of the Lich.  It also points to the undead nature of the creature.

I first encountered liches in the Dungeons and Dragons game but, upon reflection, I realised that it is quite common in many fantasy milieu.  Tolkien certainly uses the idea in numerous ways.  Sauron embeds much of his power and essence into the ruling Ring and he cannot be destroyed while the Ring remains.  Similarly, the Nazgul cannot be destroyed while the Ring exists.  Their physical forms could be destroyed, as they were at the ford at Rivendell, but their quaking ghosts returned to their master to gain new forms.  Also, Bombadil tells Frodo that the magic that sustains a barrow wight could only be destroyed if the the barrow was broken and the treasure therein dispersed among anyone who wanted it.

H.P. Lovecraft, Clark Ashton Smith and Robert E Howard (all friends and correspondents)all use the idea at times.  Howard’s Thulsa Doom is an immortal/undead sorcorer with a skull head, different from the Conan the Barbarian movie villian.  The movie Thulsa is apparently immortal, has a similar penchant for snakes that Voldemort has, but is ultimately slain by Conan.  The book/comic Thulsa Doom pops up numerous times even after having been, apparently, slain.  Lovecraft’s – The Thing on the Doorstep explores the idea of powerful wizard remaining deathless through the use of arcane magics, as do some of Smith’s stories.  Lovecraft also uses this idea to a degree in The Whisperer in Darkness where a man’s soul/mind is kept alive in a steel cannister; somehow removed from his dismembered body by alien arts, to voyage to other worlds.

The idea of a lich is present in Russian folklore in the form Koschei the Deathless- a powerful evil wizard who, according to the wiki entry:

cannot be killed by conventional means targeting his body. His soul is hidden separate from his body inside a needle, which is in an egg, which is in a duck, which is in a hare, which is in an iron chest(sometimes the chest is crystal and/or gold), which is buried under a green oak tree, which is on the island of Buyan, in the ocean. As long as his soul is safe, he cannot die. If the chest is dug up and opened, the hare will bolt away. If it is killed, the duck will emerge and try to fly off. Anyone possessing the egg has Koschei in their power. He begins to weaken, becomes sick and immediately loses the use of his magic. If the egg is tossed about, he likewise is flung around against his will. If the egg is broken (in some tales this must be done by specifically breaking it against Koschei’s forehead), Koschei will die.

The story of Koschei and how he has hidden his soul is full of alchemical imagry.  Just consider the elements and symbols represented by the egg, hare, duck, iron chest, oak tree, under the earth, island and ocean/water.

In Fantasy literature the item in which a lich hides his soul is called a phylactery.  This is completely analogous to the term Horcrux and fulfills the same purpose.  It may be an echo of the ancient Egyptian use of canopic jars to hold the viscera of their mummified owner for the afterlife.

I’ve been looking at my Advanced Dungeons & Dragons 2nd Ed. Monstrous Manual (1993)  and noting many similarities  Rowling’s Voldemort has with a lich.  The entry on Lich defines the creature as undead (is Voldmort undead?), of supra-genius intelligence and can only be damaged by magic or magical weapons.

The lich is, perhaps, the most powerful form of undead known to exist.  They seek to further their own power at all costs…

They were originally powerful wizards.

A lich is able to employ spells just as it did in life.  It still requires the use of its spell books, magical componants and similar objects.  It is important to note that liches have had a great deal of time to research and create new magical spells and objects.  Thus, adventurers should be prepared to face magic the likes of which they have never seen before when stalking a lich.

Defeating a lich in combat is difficult indeed, but actually managing to destroy the creature is harder still.  In all cases, a lich will protect itself from annihilation with the creation of a phylactory in which to store its life force.  In order to ensure the final destruction of a lich, its body must be wholly annihilated and its phylactory must be sought out and destroyed in some manner.  Since the lich will always take great care to see to it that its phylactory is well hidden and protected this can be an undertaking fully as daunting as the defeat of the lich in its physical form (think Dumbledore’s and Harry’s horcrux hunt and destruction).

A lich will make its home in some ominous fortified area, often a strong keep or vast subterranean crypt (big tick on Voldemort’s desire for Hogwarts).

…a lich will depend on its magical powers to accomplish its goals.  If this is not sufficient, however, the lich is quite capable of animating a force of undead troops to act on its behalf (inferi!).

The creature has no interest in good and evil… the creature will do whatever it must to further its own causes.

A lich can exist for centuries without change.  Its will drives it onwards to master new magics and harness mystical powers not available to it in its previous life.  Few liches call themselves by their old names when the years have drained the last vestiges of their humanity from them.  Instead they often adopt pseudonyms like “the Black Hand” or “the Forgotten King.”  (I Am Lord Voldemort)  Learning the true name of a lich is rumored to confer power over the creature.

In order to become a lich, the wizard must prepare its phylactory.  The phylactory, which can almost be any manner of object, must be of the finest craftsmanship and materials… Once this object is created, the would be lich must craft a potion of extreme toxicity… the potion is imbibed.  Rather than death, the potion causes the wizard to undergo a transformation into its new state. (Horcrux creation requires a murder, in this case its self-murder)

There you go.  If you ever run up against one make sure he reveals the whereabouts of his phylactory just before he delivers you a coup de grace.  Then get yourself rescued or have the lich distracted before the blow lands.  Telling one that their cod piece is untied always works.  Then get medieval on his rump.

I hope you might have been at least mildly interested in the above.  It was to me and I always enjoy leafing through my Monstrous Manual.  Beauty really is in the eye of a Beholder!

  • Share/Bookmark

{ 20 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Travis PrinziNo Gravatar August 23, 2009 at 9:35 am

Excellent post, Matthew! I knew there was some literary precedent for Horcruxes, but I didn’t realize just how extensive the history of that magical device was.

2 Dave the LongwindedNo Gravatar August 23, 2009 at 9:35 am

Wow, korg! That’s extremely fascinating to me. All sorts of ideas are running around in my head, many of them not really all that relevant to HP.

My experience with the word “lich” is rather minute. I’ve encountered it via World of Warcraft: Wrath of the Lich King. I’m not a WoW player, but pretty much every gaming friend I have is. The Lich King is described as a powerful fallen shaman whose “spirit was magically shackled to an ancient suit of armor” so that he could command an “army of the undead.”

You can read about it here: http://www.worldofwarcraft.com/wrath/features/story/story.xml

Very fascinating to a nerd like me!

3 korg20000bcNo Gravatar August 23, 2009 at 9:52 am

Thankyou Travis and Dave.
It just occured to me that I AM in front of Lord Voldemort may be a hint to Voldemort’s self-view as a diety. I AM being how the Judeo-Christian God describes himself.

Thanks for the link too, Dave. I haven’t played WoW either. I remember searching behind a picture in some nondescript house in the Baldur’s Gate game. Some message like “You really shouldn’t do that…” appeared. I searched again, naturally, and a very peeed-off lich learned me one.

4 Graham BadgerNo Gravatar August 23, 2009 at 10:59 am

This is actually one of those things that because I have dealt with it for so long (D&D, Baldurs Gate, WoW, that I figured everyone made the connection) I actually played as a Lich once in D&D that mistake and regretted it later when I became way way too powerful hehe.

Yeah, you can trace phylactery’s way way back in history. It’s not a new idea that Rowling made up, but she did put an interesting twist on it. Correct me if I am wrong but I am pretty sure no other author has used the idea of multiple phylactery’s.

I also like the idea of I AM being a reference toward Exodus 3:14. It would make a lot of sense if you followed the line of thinking from Dungeons and Dragons that a lich made his phylactery in order to pursue godhood usually.

5 Graham BadgerNo Gravatar August 23, 2009 at 11:13 am

Oh, I forgot to mention. While Warcraft Lore (Which I know way too much of, so many wasted years on video games) does use the term “lich”, they are not really the same thing as their literary/D&D counterparts. Instead of being wizards or sorcerers that willingly removed their soul, they are warlocks who were killed and then re-animated under the control of Ner’zhul, the “Lich King”, a former Shaman who was granted great power after death by The Burning Legion.

Sorry, I just can’t help spewing random knowledge that I have stored up there every now and then :)

6 Steve MorrisonNo Gravatar August 23, 2009 at 1:30 pm

Frazer had several chapters about “the external soul” in The Golden Bough, starting with this one; you can see how widespread and ancient this archetype really is. Tolkien, for what it’s worth, did remark in one of his letters that

The Ring of Sauron is only one of the various mythical treatments of the placing of one’s life, or power, in some external object, which is thus exposed to capture or destruction with disastrous results to oneself.

But of course, Sauron wasn’t trying to ensure his immortality by forging the One Ring — he already was immortal! His motive was to control all the other rings of power.

7 miles365No Gravatar August 23, 2009 at 7:17 pm

Voldemort’s horcruxes remind me of Stravinsky’s ballet The Firebird. The hero, Prince Ivan, chases and catches the famed firebird, who, in return for her freedom, agrees to offer assistance to Ivan. Ivan sees 13 princesses, and falls in love with one. He finds that the princesses are captives of Koschei (the Deathless, or the Immortal, of the Russian folktales that Korg mentioned). The firebird helps Ivan by using her magical powers, and tells him that the secret to Koschei’s immortality is that his soul is hidden in an egg.

The wikipedia page on Koschei has “horcrux” under “See Also.” Good catch, Korg.

8 Arabella FiggNo Gravatar August 24, 2009 at 11:49 am

I first encountered the term lych as “lych gate” in a novel, in the ’70s. This is a roofed gate to a churchyard under which a bier is set during a burial service while awaiting the clergyman. Another name for it is ” resurrection gate.”

I’m always amused by the grandiose pseudonyms liches (and other evil characters) choose. This and their indifference to either good or evil, in their quest to further their agenda, reflects their gross narcissism.

Fascinating post, Korg. Who knew D&D was so educational, even a gateway to great literature?

9 Lily lunaNo Gravatar August 24, 2009 at 3:30 pm

Very interesting to a non-gamer like me. This concept also appears in Lloyd Alexander’s Prydain series. I forget the character names now, but I recall the evil wizard hid his soul/life force in some sort of strong wood toothpick high in a tree. I think in his case breaking the toothpick killed the wizard which would be different from Voldemort. Good thinking about I AM, too.

10 Arabella FiggNo Gravatar August 24, 2009 at 3:39 pm

Lily Luna, it was the wizard Morda (in Taran Wanderer) and he cut off his little finger and hid within it his life, and placed it in a coffer in a hollow tree “where none could find it.”

Taran tells him, “You set yourself above the human kind. You scorned their weakness, despised their frailty, and could not see yourself as one of them.” Sound like anyone we know?

The finger shard was broken in a fight between the two, accidentally by Morda himself while each had an end of it (Taran could not break it himself). Morda fell to the ground “like a pile of broken twigs.” (chapters 9 & 10)

11 FrickaNo Gravatar August 25, 2009 at 6:31 pm

What an interesting post you have written, korg! I’m not familiar with the Dungeons and Dragons game, but the connections you make with Harry Potter in re the dead/non dead are intriguing. I am more of a folk and fairy tale expert, so I have studied the Katschei( there are variant spellings of the name) legend in Russian fairy tales. The Katschei, as you noted, keeps his heart in a secret place, and if the hero or heroine of the story can discover where that is and destroy it, they can defeat him. Like Lily Luna and Arabella Figg, I’m a reader of the Lloyd Alexander Chronicles of Prydain as well, and there is some connection in the L.A. stories to those found in Harry Potter. Wonder if anyone has ever asked JKR about possible influence from the Alexander books !

12 korg20000bcNo Gravatar August 25, 2009 at 8:25 pm

Thanks Frika,
The Warlock’s Hairy Heart in Beedle the Bard is another interesting look at the horcrux/phalacterly device.
I’ve never read any of Lloyd Alexander’s stuff but it sounds interesting. It’s funny how, back in the day, we were all discussing if Harry is a horcrux -over a thousand comments on the post. A lot of people were wondering if horcruxes were used up whenever voldemort might be slain.

Arabella Figg- “Fascinating post, Korg. Who knew D&D was so educational, even a gateway to great literature?”

It was certainly educational for me and has led me to a whole rangeof classic literature. Although it wasn’t D&D that started it. It was a game on the Texas Instruments TI99/4A called Tunnels of Doom. My brother got it during the Christmas holidays an about 1982. Awesome. That same summer my friend got D&D for Christmas. Shortly after that I started on the Narnia series beginning with the Silver Chair because of the cover artwork.

13 SPTNo Gravatar August 25, 2009 at 9:04 pm

Perhaps by coincidence (or perhaps not) the Slytherin necklace is described as being “the size of a chicken’s egg”.

14 Arabella FiggNo Gravatar August 26, 2009 at 12:16 am

Korg, the Prydain books are really wonderful; they’re loosely based on Welsh mythology. The first book, The Book of Three, is my least favorite. Disney made an execrable animated film of the second, The Black Cauldron, in the early ’80s, which I avoided.

As with HP, the characters are great, the books both funny and moving, they include classic mythic elements, and choice is a huge theme. The omnibus edition, The Prydain Chronicles, includes a pronunciation guide and some backstory short stories, originally published as a separate collection; unfortunately, Coll and His White Pig isn’t included, but perhaps you can get it elsewhere.

I wouldn’t be surprised to see the Prydain Chronicles filmed (well) now.

15 Lily LunaNo Gravatar August 26, 2009 at 2:41 am

Thanks, Arabella, for providing the details. I had been thinking that the wizards name was something like Morda, but I was afraid I was just thinking of Mordred of Arthurian legend, which the name is probably based on. I attended a lecture at Azkatraz on Arthurian legend/legendary objects and their relation to HP/hallows/horcruxes and realized during the course of the lecture that much of the Prydain series was based on those legends, such as the Black Cauldron which produces Cauldron Born (like inferi) and which can be destroyed only if a living person willingly throws himself into it knowing he will die. I made the mistake of renting the movie to which you referred, Arabella. Although titled The Black Cauldron, it was a mash of both The Book of Three and The Black Cauldron but horribly done and not true at all to the books. One of the few movies I truly regret renting and watching (along with The English Patient, but we’ve been over that before *grin*).

16 Arabella FiggNo Gravatar August 26, 2009 at 10:30 am

It seems to me that in much of the limited fantasy reading I’ve done, the/an evil character has mort or mord in the name. Kind of corny to me, sraight out of The Fantasy Dictionary of Names for Bad Guys.

With Prydain we have the mirror element, too. Much shared with HP, although Rowling certainly took it to many higher levels.

I never saw The English Patient, so I’m safe there, too! :-)

17 Lily LunaNo Gravatar August 26, 2009 at 12:04 pm

Probably because of the root word “mord” or “mort” meaning “death” (or “bite,” depending on the context).

18 Lily LunaNo Gravatar August 26, 2009 at 12:06 pm

Ack, scratch that. I misread/misremembered your sentence, Arabella, even though I had just read it like 1 minute earlier. Ahh, they say the short-term memory is the first to go . . .

19 Arabella FiggNo Gravatar August 26, 2009 at 12:35 pm

Yup. Just call me Dory…

20 Red RockerNo Gravatar August 26, 2009 at 8:54 pm

Very interesting post, Korg

The idea of wizards secreting their souls – or more commonly, their hearts – in some receptacle that is then hidden in order to ensure their immortality is one I’ve encountered in various forms of fantasy fiction, but I didn’t know it had such a rich history.

I was also reminded of the latest fictional use of the idea, in the Pirates of the Caribbean movies, and the quest for Davy Jones’ heart.

Leave a Comment

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Previous post:

Next post: