Posts tagged as:

copyright infringement

Saw a very interesting article the other day over on Techdirt regarding a teenager who remixed and or plagiarized the works of others into a best selling book which is up for a prestigious prize in Germany.  I’ll share some passages from the Techdirt article and then a few brief quotes from a New York Times story and leave you to make of it what you will.  Anyway, from the Techdirt article:

“Here’s a story that will get traditionalists up in arms about “stealing” and “laziness,” but they’ll all be missing the point. We’ve see for decades how remix culture works in music. The ability to take the works of someone else, mix them up with others, change them around and create something new and powerful, is a wonderful expression of culture, that shows how artistic culture is often about shared experiences and sharing works of art. But what about in the literary world?”

And here from the New York Times article:

“Ms. Hegemann finds herself in the middle of a collision — if not road kill exactly — between the staid, literary establishment in a country that venerates writers from Goethe to Mann to Grass, and the Berlin youth culture of D.J.’s and artists that sample freely and thereby breathe creativity into old forms.”

And also:

“Although Ms. Hegemann has apologized for not being more open about her sources, she has also defended herself as the representative of a different generation, one that freely mixes and matches from the whirring flood of information across new and old media, to create something new. “There’s no such thing as originality anyway, just authenticity…”

Well, those quotes by themselves should be enough to generate some discussion but check out the full articles.  Interesting reading.  Have fun!

  • Share/Bookmark

{ 54 comments }

by Dave

The copyright case Rowling brought against Steve Vander Ark goes to trial this week, as I’m sure some of you read. I’m not going to offer up anything new about the case, copyright infringement, or her ownership over her work (authorial or otherwise).

I thought I’d give you a couple of links:

This one takes you to one of the many Yahoo! articles from the AP about the story over the last couple of days.

This one takes you to the actual legal brief filed on behalf of Rowling and Warner Bros. The document is a matter of public record, and published in the The Wall Street Journal. It’s particularly interesting to read some of the summary points given in the brief concerning the books and the films.

The AP story offers this as the closing paragraph:

She said she now has second thoughts about all the encouragement she has given to online discussions and Web sites devoted to her books.

Obviously, she would not seek a wholesale shutdown of sites like The Hog’s Head. But, what if she stops actively participating with sites like The Leaky Cauldron?

Rowling has also commented that she worries about the ramifications that publishing the Lexicon might have on other sites — that publishing something previously free on the web might force the rest of us writing on the web to do the same so as to stay competative. Not sure I buy the last one.

  • Share/Bookmark

{ 45 comments }