The Pardoner’s Tale in Deathly Hallows

by Behold a Phoenix on August 31, 2007

by Johnny

J.K. Rowling’s reference to “the Pardoner’s Tale” as the realworld myth or faerie tale basis for the articles known as the Deathly Hallows is interesting because of the obvious Christian references in Chaucer’s work, The Canterbury Tales. If the Pardoner’s Tale is a morality tale then the idea of JKR tapping into Chaucer implies that Harry Potter is a morality tale for the 21st century. JKR has always said that she never sets out to preach in her writing but that morals are definitely drawn. By reading Chaucer’s tale of the Pardoner, we can have a greater understanding of the moral behind the story of the three Deathly Hallows and its implications on Harry Potter’s actions towards the end of the last novel.

The Pardoner’s Tale starts off with a grotesque and hypocritical Pardoner, who sells indulgences to the faithful. He is portrayed as a charlatan, who peddles fake relics, and merely preaches, through stories, out of deceit. He is honest to say that:

Of avarice and of such cursedness
Is all my preaching, to make them generous
To give their pennies, and namely unto me.
For my intention is only to make a profit,
And not at all for correction of sin (400-404).

The Pardoner discusses greed, avarice, gluttony, lechery, and other sins for quite a bit before he tells his tale. The story begins with three rioters drinking in a tavern where they hear from a servant boy that someone was killed the previous evening. The boy identifies the murderer as “stealthy thief men call Death” (675) and offers this warning, a couple of lines later:

And, master, before you come in his presence,
It seems to me that it would be necessary
To beware of such an adversary.
Always be ready to meet him (680-683).

After hearing the tavern-keeper confirm the boy’s story, the three rioters make a vow to become brothers and go after Death to kill him. On the way they encounter an old man who tells them that they can find Death underneath a tree. When they find the tree, they find gold coins and excited about their newly discovered treasure, subsequently forget about Death. One of the rioters is sent to a nearby town to fetch food and drink while the other two guard the treasure. These two then conspire to kill the one sent to the town; the other rioter meanwhile buys some rat poison from an apothecary and poisons the wine. When he returns, the other two kill him and then drink the poisoned wine, dying as a result. The Pardoner emphasizes that the theme here Radix malorum est Cupiditas, which is Paul’s words in 1 Timothy 6.10, “Greed is the root of evils.”

In Hermione’s tattered, old copy of The Tales of Beedle the Bard, we find a similar tale, that of the Peverell brothers in The Tale of the Three Brothers. The story starts off with three brothers using magical means to cross a very dangerous river. Death appears and is enraged that these three outsmarted him so he decides to give them each a gift. Antioch, the eldest, asks for a wand that is unbeatable in battle; Cadmus, the middle, asks for the power to recall the dead so Death gives him a Resurrection Stone; and Ignotus, the youngest asks for a means to hide from Death so that he would not follow him and Death gives him his Invisibility Cloak.

Antioch equipped with the Elder Wand, goes after a man who wronged him and kills him with the wand. He then enters a bar where drunk, he boasts of his wand and its power. He is killed in the middle of the night and his wand is taken. Death claims him. Cadmus uses his stone to bring back his love that he was going to marry. The woman appears sad, cold, and distant so he kills himself so that he can join his love. Death claims him. Finally Ignotus evades Death all his life and in the twilight of his years hands his son his Invisibility Cloak and meets Death as a friend and walks with Death as equals.

The servant boy’s words (“Always be ready to meet him [Death]“) to the three brothers in Chaucer’s tale rings true for Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows. How does one face Death? In the Tale of the Three Brothers we see a desire to master Death but eventually the first two brothers were not able to accomplish this because of their misuse of their “Hallows” articles. Ignotus chose a wise gift (judging from Death’s unwillingness to part with it) and when he was ready, embraced Death on his own terms, as a friend, as an equal. We learn through Xenophilius Lovegood that wizards and witches went beyond this “morality tale” (as Hermione herself called it on page 414) and went on a Quest to find the three articles of the Deathly Hallows; whoever possessed them all would become the Master of Death. Albus Dumbledore, through the influence of his friend Gellert Grindelwald, was obsessed with the Quest, believing his ambitions of power would ultimately lead to the greater good. His mistake was no less similar to the three rioters who were seduced by greed. Dumbledore’s heart was in the Deathly Hallows, which led to ultimately the death of his sister, Ariana. It is no wonder that Dumbledore choose the words of Jesus in Matthew 6.21, “Where your treasure is, there will your heart be also” for her tombstone. The Deathly Hallows becomes even more crucial to the story as Harry Potter is tempted to find them instead of concentrating on destroying Voldemort’s horcruxes:

But Harry’s imagination was racing ahead, far beyond Ron and Hermione’s

Three objects, or Hallows, which, if united, will make the possessor master of Death/Master/Conqueror/Vanquisher/ The last enemy that shall be destroyed is death.

And he saw himself, possessor of the Hallows, facing Voldemort, whose Horcruxes were no match. “Neither can live while the other survives.” Was this the answer? Hallows verses Horcruxes? Was there a way, after all, to ensure that he was the one who triumphed? If he were the master of the Deathly Hallows, would he be safe (429-430).

Harry’s desire to emerge from his final battle with Voldemort unscathed temporarily held sway over him. Hermione kept reminding him that he was getting “carried away,” “sidetracked”, and warned him to “forget the Deathly Hallows” (433). Even during the battle of Hogwarts when Harry was sprinting towards the Whomping Willow to kill Nagini and jets of spells were shooting past him, he was “half believing he could outdistance death itself” (650). It was only after Harry saw the flood of memories of Severus Snape and Dumbledore talking about his fate in “The Prince’s Tale” did he realize that he had to die in order to defeat Voldemort:

Finally, the truth. Lying with his face pressed into the dusty carpet of the office where he had once thought he was learning the secrets of victory, Harry understood at last that he was not supposed to survive. His job was to walk calmly into Death’s welcoming arms. (691).

Harry finally knew what he must do. His job wasn’t to save his life but to lose it in order to save the wizarding world. He made that choice by going to meet Voldemort, to ultimately meet Death. Dumbledore’s words to Harry at King’s Cross are poignant, “You are the true master of death, because the true master of death does not seek to run away from Death. He accepts that he must die, and understands that there are far, far worse things in the living world than dying” (720-721). I am reminded of what Jesus said in Matthew 10.39, “Whoever finds his life will lose it, and whoever loses his life for my sake will find it.” Before we learn that Dumbledore withheld any information on the Deathly Hallows because of his fear that Harry will fail where he had failed. However as Dumbledore said, Harry was the better man because of his choice to eschew safety and sacrifice himself. Later on after Voldemort was defeated, Harry made another choice, to return the Elder Wand to Dumbledore’s tomb and to not go after the Resurrection Stone, which dropped in the Forbidden Forest. Harry was the rightful possessor of the Deathly Hallows and decided to only keep the Invisibility Cloak. This shows that he went where Dumbledore and others failed to go.

Both Chaucer and JKR bring up the question of how we face Death in their respective works. Chaucer, through the wicked Pardoner, show that while the three rioters were trying to kill Death, they unknowingly found him when their greed made them kill each other. In Deathly Hallows, Antioch and Cadmus used their Hallows foolishly and met early deaths while Ignotus used the Cloak to hide from Death until he was ready to meet him as an old friend. Harry was tempted but he made a choice to face Death and sacrifice himself for others. We are reminded of Dumbledore’s words to Harry in the first novel that it is our choices that show us what we truly are. In the end we learn that love conquers all. JKR’s debt to Chaucer is telling and of course Deathly Hallows and the Pardoner’s Tale point backward to the one who suffered on our behalf and three days later, truly conquered Death. Our hope is the Resurrection: Christ’s and ours, and this hope allow us to say to Death, “Where is your sting?”

  • Share/Bookmark

{ 9 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Mary Jo NeyerNo Gravatar August 31, 2007 at 5:11 pm

The story of the Three Brothers has very unusual names for the trio. “Antioch” was the capitol of ancient Syria, but I had never heard of the word as a personal name. Knowing JK’s fondness for classical allusions, I decided to research the name “Antiochus”, and found two, father and son, who could fit very well with the warlike, boastful nature of the first brother.
Antiochus III the Great was a Hellenistic ruler who lived about 241-187 B.C.Most of his years as ruler were spent in warfare. He died, perhaps fittingly, in 187 B.C. while attempting to rob a temple at Elymais, Persia.
Antiochus IV, son of Antiochus the Great, reigned from 175 B.C. Rabbinical sources refer to this Antiochus as “the wicked”. His cruelties towards practicing Jews led to the revolt described in the Book of Maccabees. He looted and desecrated the temple, and erected on the altar the “abomination that desecrates.” Antiochus died in Persia in 164 B.C.
Cadmus was, in Greek mythology, the son of the Phoenician King of Tyre. He was credited with introducing the alphabet into Greece, and is said to have founded the city of Thebes. It is interesting that he is associated with the stone of resurrection, for in the founding of Thebes, cadmus, at the instruction of Athena, sowed Dragon’s Teeth which sprang up as a huge number of armed men. Cadmus threw a STONE among them, causing the men to kill one another until only 5 survived, who helped him build the city of Thebes. Eventually, when much older and deeply troubled by misfortune, he was turned into a DRAGON, along with his wife.
IGNOTUS is not a personal name at all, as far as I am aware. It simply means “unknown” or “anonymous”. It will be interesting to hear what other readers think this name might signify. To me, it brings to mind the “unknown soldiers” whom we honor for their sacrifices for freedom. It also makes me think of all those who have gone before us-our ancestors who were farmers, fishermen, tailors, etc., who worked hard, loved their families, and in their daily deeds of kindness and self-sacrifice are unknown to historians, and known only to God.

2 reyhanNo Gravatar September 1, 2007 at 10:28 am

Thanks for telling us the Pardoner’s Tale, Johnny. I never read the Canterbury Tales, so this is a good cultural “backstory” for me. I’m sure Mr. Bloom would approve.

Or would he? I mean, as a result of this post, potentially thousands of people will have been exposed to what Mr. Bloom would probably consider a keystone of English literature. Doesn’t that then kind of disprove his theory, that reading the Harry Potter books could not possibly be a good step towards greater cultural literacy?

Put that in your pipe and smoke it, Mr. I-am-the-alpha-and-omega-in-deciding-what-is-worth-reading Bloom!

3 wmNo Gravatar September 1, 2007 at 3:31 pm

i just read the last book and i have to say it was very enjoyable.i almost cried when harry went back to the forrest to die.i loved the end rowling did a very good job on the seventh book.anyone who did not like it is crazy.does anyone else have any comments?

4 TrishNo Gravatar September 1, 2007 at 8:42 pm

What makes Harry’s choice so poignant is his youth. In making the choice to die he is giving up much more than someone who is say, my age (early 50’s) would. He is giving up all the things he might have done in life–marriage, children, everything.

reyhan–considering what I think of Mr. Bloom, I rather hope he doesn’t approve. I’d find the book suspect if he did. Sorry.

5 Dave, the LongwindedNo Gravatar September 1, 2007 at 8:58 pm

It’s been so long since I read the Canterbury Tales. I’ve spent a lot of time wondering about “The Tale of the Three Brothers” and its connections. I was certain Rowling pulled it from somewhere. These connections are really interesting.

Oh well, time to pull some other classic literature I haven’t read in a while…

6 Travis PrinziNo Gravatar September 1, 2007 at 9:40 pm

I was actually quite surprised when Rowling answered “The Pardoner’s Tale” when asked about inspiration for the Deathly Hallows. But now I get why she answered that way – she was referring to the structure of the children’s story, not the hallows themselves (I had expected her to answer that question by saying, “Arthurian legend.”)

It’s been way too long since I’ve spent any time with Chaucer.

7 EeyoreNo Gravatar September 3, 2007 at 2:59 pm

I don’t remember which part of Canterbury Tales we read in high school, but considering that my 40th class reunion (which I was unable to attend) was this past weekend, it’s no wonder I don’t remember any of it. I don’t think it was the Pardoner’s Tale that I read, however.

Thanks, Johnny, for telling us the story and for all your insights on how it relates to the Tale of the Three Brothers and to the choices Harry needed to make. Excellent.

And it makes me even more impressed with the detail and thought that Rowling put into the Harry Potter books, particularly Deathly Hallows.

Pat

8 Ginevra PotterNo Gravatar September 10, 2007 at 1:10 pm

Mary Jo said, “IGNOTUS is not a personal name at all, as far as I am aware. It simply means ‘unknown’ or ‘anonymous’. It will be interesting to hear what other readers think this name might signify.”

Thanks for putting together all of these meanings. For me, I would imagine that a man who spent his life under the cloak of invisibility to hide from Death would be unknown and anonymous in almost all his work. “Unknown” and “anonymous” are nearly synonymous with “invisible.”

9 SolNo Gravatar July 31, 2009 at 7:02 pm

I quite agree with Ginny’s comment about Ignotus. I think that it has to do with his not attempting to utwit Death (an impossible match) and thus because of his wisdom leading a full life.
I’m really pleased with this article, I was reading about Middle English literature and Chaucer, and I though that “the pardoner’s tale” was related to the three brother’s…
Thanks a lot!

Leave a Comment

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Previous post:

Next post: