The Seer Overheard, by revgeorge

by Travis Prinzi on July 3, 2009

Another guest post by revgeorge!

c25-the-seer-overheardGlad to be back with another post on HBP. Sorry I’ll have to briefly touch on many points.

The Trio plus One is enjoying an interlude of calm and happiness. Harry is blissfully happy with Ginny. Even Ron and Hermione are happy and laughing for once. But there are still hints of gloom. Ginny mentions three Dementor attacks. The war is still going on despite the relative insulation the students enjoy at Hogwarts. Do you think Rowling succeeds in showing us the intensity of the war raging outside through only snippets of information breaking into the pretty much routine life of Hogwarts? After all, even though Voldemort’s back and war is on, this school year for Harry is pretty much the same as usual. Any thoughts?

Quite a bit of time seems to pass in this chapter without much comment. Harry & Ginny’s happy times are curtailed because Ginny must study for OWLS and Harry has detentions still with Snape, which Snape seems to relish dragging out. So, several weeks or more must pass rather quickly in this chapter.

Hermione won’t let the Half-blood Prince go and through her research comes up with the picture of Eileen Prince. After much heated discussion, no one is satisfied with this information. Harry is certain the Prince is a boy; Hermione thinks it must be Eileen Prince. In a way they are both on the right track. Eileen is the mother of the Prince, and the book is most likely hers passed down to Snape. But Snape is the self proclaimed Half-blood Prince.

Right after this discussion about the Prince, Snape is mentioned again. It’s almost as if JKR is slapping our faces with the latent connection, Half-blood Prince=Snape, with just enough doubts thrown in with Eileen Prince to keep us from seeing the connection clearly.

Harry then receives another note from Dumbledore and heads off to meet him. Along the way he passes near the Room of Requirement just in time to hear Professor Trelawney thrown out of it by an apparently ecstatic Draco. Interesting point about the Room, if you try to get in and find out what someone is doing, you can’t. But if you try to get in for your own purposes, like Harry with the potions book or Trelawney and her sherry bottles, you can get in with no problems and possibly interrupt someone trying to work secretly. Does this make sense? Wouldn’t the Room had made some especially hidden place for Draco to work? Plus, for the first time all book neither Crabbe nor Goyle are on lookout.

This chapter then closes off with two terribly important things, which I will just comment on in brief. Harry finally hears from Trelawney who exactly overhead the prophecy being made, Snape again! Dumbledore says in Order of the Phoenix that the eavesdropper was found out half way into the prophecy and thrown out of The Hog’s Head. But Trelawney sees Snape caught by Aberforth after she comes out of her trance. What’s going on here? It’s obvious that Snape only gives Voldemort half the prophecy but did he hear all of it or did he catch only part before being caught and held up to be seen by Trelawney?

After this an enraged Harry rushes off to Dumbledore’s office to confront him but is quickly dumbfounded when he learns Dumbledore has located another horcrux and wants Harry to go with him. His excitement and anger wage war until Dumbledore presses his thoughts out of him.

For more discussion:

  • Thoughts on Trelawney. She seems a complete old fraud but yet does have a real gift. What do you make of her and prophecy and divination in general?
  • Dumbledore’s face whitens when Harry reveals he knows Snape told Voldemort the prophecy. Why do you think Dumbledore reacted this way, and what do you think of his attempted defense of Snape?
  • Dumbledore told Harry to keep his invisibility cloak on him at all times but yet gives Harry time to go back to Gryffindor Tower to retrieve his cloak. What do you think of this?

Any other thoughts? After this chapter things get progressively darker for awhile.

  • Share/Bookmark

{ 48 comments… read them below or add one }

1 revgeorgeNo Gravatar July 3, 2009 at 10:45 pm

I’ll be the first to comment on my own post. There was so much more I wanted to say on Snape and Trelawney and Dumbledore and the prophecy and Dumbledore’s interaction with Harry in this chapter. But I found my post getting longer & longer so I had to cut it somewhere. I hope some of you may hit upon a few of the ideas I had. If not, maybe I’ll chime in later. :)

2 AmandaNo Gravatar July 4, 2009 at 12:38 am

Both the point about Trelawny’s version of events and about Dumbledore asking Harry to get the cloak confused me, though I suppose with the latter, Dumbledore might have just been giving Harry an excuse to go say goodbye or to have some more time to think out his anger about Snape.

I did want to mention, though, about Trelawney and her gift – in an earlier chapter, Trelawney passes Harry, who’s hidden, and pulls out a tarot card about a dark young man, possibly trouble, who dislikes the questioner. She decides that can’t be right, and moves on, reshuffling. While most of what Trelawney does outside her trance is ridiculously fake, her card reading in this chapter actually seems to make sense, both here and with the lightning-struck tower. Is it possible that underneath all the ethereal personality, Trelawney does have a power she doesn’t fully understand, something beyond her two real predictions?

3 revgeorgeNo Gravatar July 4, 2009 at 2:01 am

Amanda, very good comments. Trelawney’s character and her abilities was something I especially wanted to say more about in my initial post.

4 SPTNo Gravatar July 4, 2009 at 10:25 am

Trelawney has Cassandra’s curse that her prophecies are “all heard and none believed”. She is almost always right, but rarely believed.

This is one of the oldest plot contrivances on record, dating back at least to Homer and probably further. But still a powerful literary mechanism.

I am not sure why. Maybe it is because it undercuts the “ending cliché”, the feeling of dissatisfaction we get when we know how a book is going to end.

5 miles365No Gravatar July 4, 2009 at 10:47 am

Trelawney’s problem is that she sees correctly, but interprets horribly, as Amanda notes above. When we first meet her, she sees a black dog (Sirius), but interprets it as The Grim. Both a tragic and a comic character. Rather like Lockhart in that regard.

“His excitement and anger wage war” — this scene sets up Harry’s struggle in DH, the struggle over whether to trust Dumbledore despite the “evidence” that overwhelms him.

6 AmandaNo Gravatar July 4, 2009 at 10:50 am

I don’t think she can technically be called a Cassandra figure because she doesn’t realize when she’s predicting true things. For instance, she interprets Harry’s birthday by the stars as being midwinter. She tries too hard. Just like with the tarot cards, she says they can’t be right. In some senses, she’s Cassandra-like, in that no one will believe the tower is coming, but in others, I think it’s more fear that she’s not a true Seer that keeps her in that false-interpretation mode.

7 SPTNo Gravatar July 4, 2009 at 11:11 am

miles365 On the contrary, I think Trelawney [i]correctly[/i] interprets the tea leafs as a Grim, and therefore a death omen for Harry. She is also correct when she notes that Harry (or Ron, but Harry is listed first) was the first to rise from a dinner of thirteen and will be the first to die. And when she sees the Grim again in the crystal ball on the day Hermione quits Divination forever.

Harry does die at the end of Prisoner of Azkaban. He is killed by dementors while trying to help Sirius. Only the use of the Time Turner allows him to cheat death. One type of time magic (the Time Turner) overrides another type of time magic(prophecy).

8 AmandaNo Gravatar July 4, 2009 at 11:12 am

By that interpretation, though, Harry isn’t *killed* by dementors at the end of book 3 – he’s just rendered soulless. He’d still be alive, just empty.

9 revgeorgeNo Gravatar July 4, 2009 at 11:45 am

Great comments, guys. You really hit on what I was thinking about with Trelawney!

On another note, I wanted to ask what you all thought of Dumbledore’s explanation for Snape’s remorse & return to the good side. Nice bit of deception and truth mixed into one, I thought.

Continue on with the great comments. :)

10 Lily LunaNo Gravatar July 4, 2009 at 12:12 pm

Good post and questions, revgeorge.

D seems to be trying to decide whether to tell Harry Snape is the one who warned him that V was after Lily et al, but decides not to break his long ago promise to Snape. My theory about D asking Harry to get the cloak is that he uses that time to go warn Snape about Harry hearing Draco celebrating and that Harry knows Snape was the one who overheard the prophecy, and perhaps to ask Snape for permission to tell Harry the truth about Snape and Lily.

The part about Trelawney predicting Harry’s birth as being in midwinter I always thought was an unwitting sensing of the fragment of V’s soul attached to Harry (V was born in midwinter).

I have always been struck by how Trelawney describes Snape as “that pushing, thrusting young man,” some of the most sexual verbal imagery in the entire series. She really wants him, no? Did she drive herself to drink through pining after him?

It is really weird that Trelawney remembers Snape being there. I thought perhaps she went back into her trance and finished the prophecy after he was thrown out, but in D’s memory she seems to say the whole prophecy without interruption (and note how when D showed him that prophecy in OOTP he didn’t take Harry into the pensieve, he had Trelawney’s image rise out of it so that Harry couldn’t see who else was there).

I’m wondering how Draco found out how to get into the ROHT. When Marietta blabbed in OOTP, did she say walk back and forth three times thinking about what you need in your head? So is Draco the one who hid the cabinet in there after asking for a place to hide it (first time I thought of that; before I assumed it had been hidden by the house-elves)? Draco probably didn’t think of asking the room to lock itself so no one else could get into it while he’s there.

11 Lily LunaNo Gravatar July 4, 2009 at 12:21 pm

I disagree with the interpretation that Harry actually loses his soul and then regains it. The time travel thing is weird, but Harry never actually loses his soul because of the intervention of his future self whom he sees but misinterprets. Later he goes back and makes it happen, though he doesn’t know when he sets out what it is he is going to do. But what he does when he travels back in time is already predetermined because it has already occurred.

12 revgeorgeNo Gravatar July 4, 2009 at 12:25 pm

Lily Luna, good comments. I never would’ve thought much of Trelawney’s reaction to Snape, certainly not in a sexual sense!

In regard to the Cabinet, this was the one that Peeves broke in Book 2 & that Fred & George used on Montague in Book 5. The cabinet originally seemed to be in a place above Filch’s office, which was lower down in the castle. I would assume the broken cabinet remained there until the Twins used it. Whether it stayed at the same location after Montague was rescued & was then later moved by Draco to the ROHT or whether it got moved there after Montague’s rescue is hard to tell. In regard to Draco using the room, you’re probably right that he never thought to be that specific. The Room seems to desire specificity, something that Neville seems to understand later on & use to his advantage in DH.

13 revgeorgeNo Gravatar July 4, 2009 at 12:36 pm

In regard to Dumbledore’s explanation to Harry about why Snape came back after his actions in overhearing & reporting the prophecy to Voldemort, I thought Dumbledore quite inept at trying to tell Harry that Snape felt remorse over sending LV to kill James & Lily & Harry. It’s a cleverly disguised explanation. Snape comes back because of one of the Potters but certainly not because of James or Harry.

Harry knows how much Snape hated his father; he assumes he must’ve felt the same way about his mother after seeing the Pensieve scene in OOTP, & he knows Snape doesn’t care about him. So, Dumbledore’s explanation that Snape suddenly feels remorse for his worst enemy & his family falls far short upon Harry’s rightfully doubtful ears.

Certainly DD can’t tell Harry the truth because of his promise to Snape but to try to tell Harry some half-true explanation based on the presumption that Snape cared about James & anyone connected to James? Come on! Harry’s is not going to buy that, & he doesn’t. Is this because DD is incapable of being honest to any great extent? Shouldn’t he have said to Harry, instead of offering some lame story, “I know why Snape came back & I trust him completely but I can’t discuss it with you?”

It still probably wouldn’t satisfy Harry but at least it wouldn’t insult his intelligence.

14 Lily LunaNo Gravatar July 4, 2009 at 1:11 pm

I think D was just laying the groundwork for when Snape kills him, so Harry can think D was a foolish old man to trust Snape. He tries to do it while at the same time giving Harry a hint, so that maybe on future reflection Harry (or Hermione) will figure out the truth. After all at some point Snape has to get Harry to trust him enough to believe him when he tells Harry he has to sacrifice himself to V in order to destroy the soul fragment attached to him.

While your formulation of what D should have said to Harry would have been kinder to all, it might have raised too much doubt among the Order if Harry had repeated it. This brings to my mind the unaswered question from DH, which is: Who is the “source we discussed” that V refers to from whom he thinks Snape is getting his info at the beginning of DH? My best theory is that it’s Phineas Nigellus — that V thinks Phineas would be loyal to Snape and V as a fellow Slytherin and would repeat to Snape conversations he heard in the Headmaster’s office (in use by McGonagall).

15 revgeorgeNo Gravatar July 4, 2009 at 1:21 pm

Lily Luna, you’re probably right. It just really seems laughable, though, that DD would think Snape coming back because of James would be a reasonable explanation for Harry. But perhaps you’re right in that it’s not meant to be that at the time but that perhaps Harry would pick up later what DD meant by it, namely regarding Lily. I wonder if Dumbledore ever knew what Harry saw of Snape’s worst memory?

Of course, Harry never figures out about Snape & Lily until The Prince’s Tale.

In regard to the “source we discussed,” I had thought it referred to Mundungus Fletcher but he’d be a really unreliable source since you would never be sure you could trust his information. Never thought of Nigellus. If I understand, though, you’re not saying Nigellus was a Voldemort supporter or sympathizer but more of a fan of Snape & confidant of him?

16 Lily LunaNo Gravatar July 4, 2009 at 1:45 pm

Well Phineas WAS a fan of Snape, but he’s not a traitor. What I’m thinking is Snape tells V that Phineas is loyal to Snape and to V and that Phineas never liked D and that Phineas is passing him info he overhears when McG is using the office and/or info he overhears at Grimmauld Place (actually, more likely Grimmauld Place). Otherwise, Snape would have to convince V that a member of the Order was traitorous to the order and loyal to Snape. Could be Mundungus (who is whom I originally thought of).

I’ve often wondered whether Hermione doesn’t have her suspicions about Snape’s motivations, esp. after the Silver Doe scene, but keeps quiet about them. In fact, Harry has told her and Ron everything that happened in D’s office when he goes back to give them the Felix Felicis, so she may even figure out that if Snape’s biggest regret was for his actions leading to the killing of the Potters and Snape hated James, then he must have cared deeply about Lily. After all, Hermione is better at feelings and stuff than Ron and Harry (she also doesn’t have Snape’s Worst Memory or a longstanding hatred of Snape to deceive her).

17 revgeorgeNo Gravatar July 4, 2009 at 2:41 pm

Agree on Phineas. I can see Voldemort believing what he says but not thinking of Mundungus as an impeachable source.

Regarding Hermione possibly knowing about Snape’s feelings for Lily, I’m not so sure on that. Hermione’s good with feelings, except her own perhaps, but Snape? He’s a bit more inscrutable than Ron or Harry or Cho per se.

18 908sspNo Gravatar July 4, 2009 at 3:55 pm

I thought Snape said he had a source because he didn’t want V to know he was in the order himself. Since he was in the order there was more information he could be giving and was withholding. By saying he had a source that limits the information.

19 Lily LunaNo Gravatar July 4, 2009 at 4:18 pm

Yes, but after he kills Dumbledore, he wouldn’t be in the Order anymore and in theory shouldn’t have access to info like when the Order really is going to move Harry. And there’s obviously a “source” with a name known to V that V thinks Snape has and who would have access to that info, which means it has to be either someone in the Order or someone who can spy on the Order. Which pretty much means either Mundungus or Phineas.

20 Lily LunaNo Gravatar July 4, 2009 at 4:22 pm

In fact, Snape’s source probably is Phineas with Dumbledore’s consent. Unless there’s someone in the Order who secretly knows that Snape is still on their side and is the real source, since as a practical matter they cleared out of Grimmauld Place after D was killed so Phineas wouldn’t have anything to overhear, now that I think about it.

21 Lily LunaNo Gravatar July 4, 2009 at 4:28 pm

Sorry, that like totally rambled, didn’t it. Maybe we are back to Mundungus.

22 Lily LunaNo Gravatar July 4, 2009 at 4:35 pm

Anyway, sorry to hijack this thread into a discussion of DH instead of the chapter at hand.

With regard to your original question about whether Rowling is effective in showing the horror of the war outside the Hogwarts cocoon, I don’t know. She does convey some of the terrible things – dementor attacks, Greyback killing the little boy, etc. together with the comedy of Dung pretending to be an inferius (sounds like something out of Scooby Doo). But it seems like a distant storm, kind of like how Harry describes V punishing the Malfoys while he’s digging Dobby’s grave.

Okay, time to finish cleaning up before the family comes over for July 4th dinner.

23 Library LilyNo Gravatar July 4, 2009 at 4:41 pm

Revgeorge, great post. I had the same question you had about how much Snape really heard of the prophecy. The only way I could figure out to reconcile Dumbledore’s and Trelawney’s stories is that perhaps Aberforth threw Snape against a wall and demanded of him what he was about (or something like that), effectively preventing him from hearing the rest of the prophecy. Then he would have revealed him to Dumbledore and Trelawney and subsequently thrown him out of the pub.

As to whether Hermione had any comprehension of Snape’s love for Lily–well, Hermione never seemed inclined to keep her brain waves to herself. I would think she’d have said something. Not that that would have served the plot well. :P

In regard to Dumbledore’s attempt to explain Snape’s loyalties to Harry without giving him the whole truth, I don’t think it was necessarily an innate incapability of being honest (although because of his prior promise, he was certainly bound to not be straightforward.) Perhaps it was another instance of an old man being guilty of forgetting what it was like to be young. He might have expected Harry to take him at his word.

24 AmandaNo Gravatar July 4, 2009 at 6:49 pm

I’m not sure Phineas can be the source Snape tells V about. First off, looking through The Prince’s Tale, I’m already wondering how Snape managed to get back into Dumbledore’s office prior to being made Headmaster, to talk to DD about giving V the correct date. The ministry hadn’t even fallen at that point. I suppose he might have been able to had Hogwarts been completely empty, of teachers and everyone, for the summer. Second, why would the Order have discussed their plans in the Headmaster’s office? Especially if the school was closed for the summer. Third, if the Order wasn’t discussing plans there, I wonder where DD’s other portrait might hang, so that he could learn about their plans. The whole situation confuses me, actually. It’s a little farfetched for Snape to tell V that he can’t lead the Death Eaters into Grimmauld Place and yet can go there himself in order to talk with Phineas, who is hearing information about the Order from the Headmaster’s office. Even more farfetched for Snape to say he can sneak into Hogwarts to talk to Phineas and none of the other portraits would report him. Then again, Snape being able to get back into the school when everyone’s on the lookout for him seems a little farfetched, too, so I don’t know what to think.

Does DD have a portrait somewhere else? If not, how is he so well-informed about the Order’s plans after his death?

I suppose this is all completely off-topic for this chapter, but I just saw a lot of discussion above…

25 miles365No Gravatar July 4, 2009 at 7:59 pm

For some reason I was thinking that Snape had cast the imperious curse on Mundungus.

26 Steve MorrisonNo Gravatar July 4, 2009 at 9:29 pm

I’ve assumed that the “source” was Dumbledore’s portrait — of course, this requires Voldemort to believe the portrait didn’t know how Dumbledore had died! Perhaps it had already been painted some time ago, and wouldn’t know of anything which had happened to Dumbledore after it was painted? But it would still have had to have been recently painted in order to have useful intel on the Order’s plans for moving Harry.

Amanda, Rowling did say in an interview that Hogwarts was deserted over the summer (except by Filch). Of course this is an extra-textual statement, but if we accept it, it helps explain Snape’s ability to sneak into Hogwarts undetected. The problem remains, though, of how Snape could get past the castle’s magical defenses; not to mention whether Hogwarts would still be left unguarded even in wartime.

27 AmandaNo Gravatar July 4, 2009 at 9:41 pm

I imagine Hagrid’s there over the summer, too. Of course, while Hagrid knows the truth about Snape, I don’t think it would be difficult for Snape to sneak past Hagrid, OR Filch for that matter. Snape knew all of Dumbledore’s protections around the school, too, so I don’t imagine that would be a problem. However, if the school is abandoned, how is Dumbledore’s portrait going to know about the Order’s plans, unless he has a portrait elsewhere?

28 Lily LunaNo Gravatar July 4, 2009 at 11:05 pm

On further reflection, I guess Phineas can’t be the source if the Order has abandoned Grimmauld Place.

Snape Confunds Mundungus at D’s suggestion to implant the idea of the seven Potters in his head, he doesn’t use the Imperius Curse on him.

There are really two “sources.” One is Snape’s (or Dumbledore’s)actual source and one is the source that Snape tells V he has. They might be the same, but not necessarily. Mundungus might be one or the other or both. It’s possible that McGonagall is the actual source as she might talk to Dumbledore’s portrait, not realizing D would pass the info on to Snape. No one else in the Order seems to fit unless V thinks Snape’s getting info out of “that brainless oaf, Hagrid.”

I’m not sure where else D would have a portrait. He always eschewed the Ministry, so not likely to have a portrait there (except maybe as head of the Wizengamot) and he was never a healer, so no portrait at St. Mungo’s.

29 Steve MorrisonNo Gravatar July 4, 2009 at 11:17 pm

Perhaps because the plan was Dumbledore’s to begin with? He might have discussed it with Order members before he died, or left sealed orders; or they might even have been consulting his portrait too.

The reason I mention the castle’s magical defenses is that at times, the castle seems to be sentient — remember how the Headmaster’s office “sealed itself” against Umbridge? Of course, that might be the answer in itself; if the castle had a mind of its own, it might have known enough to realize that Snape was not an enemy and let him pass.

30 Lily LunaNo Gravatar July 4, 2009 at 11:35 pm

Steve, regarding your first suggestion -it’s possible D might have taken one Order member into his confidence (I doubt he’d let too many know to reduce the risk of info leaking to the wrong people), and it does not appear to have been McGonagall or she would not have tried to kill Snape and chase him from the school in the end. But D might well have used McGonagall unwittingly. Couldn’t you just see his portrait giving her instructions to have the Order move Harry early and then the portrait giving Snape his instructions.

Second suggestion is a possibility. Or maybe Snape gets in via the Shrieking Shack and the Whomping Willow and flies a broomstick directly up to the headmaster’s window (or maybe he can fly in on a broomstick and turn off and on the protection like D does returning from the cave).

31 revgeorgeNo Gravatar July 5, 2009 at 1:28 am

Lily Luna, don’t worry about hijacking the thread. Goodness knows I’ve done the same thing plenty of times. :)

Library Lily wrote: “In regard to Dumbledore’s attempt to explain Snape’s loyalties to Harry without giving him the whole truth, I don’t think it was necessarily an innate incapability of being honest (although because of his prior promise, he was certainly bound to not be straightforward.) Perhaps it was another instance of an old man being guilty of forgetting what it was like to be young. He might have expected Harry to take him at his word.”

I think perhaps you may be right in this regard, Library Lily. Dumbledore does consistently seem to think that just because he believes the best of people that everyone else does too. He admits to Harry at the end of OOTP that he forgot how much animosity there was between Snape & Sirius.

However, it still does seem a lame attempt on DD’s part to explain why Snape would show so much remorse & turn against Voldemort just because LV went after James Potter & family. But it was perhaps necessary for plot purposes. To further muddy the waters regarding Snape.

32 Arabella FiggNo Gravatar July 5, 2009 at 7:24 pm

Sorry to be late to the party, due to the holiday. Great post and questions, revgeorge!

I think, in DD’s explanation to Harry, he might have been referring Harry’s mind back to his own very recent horror over what he did to his own enemy–Draco–in the boy’s bathroom (where Harry “plunged toward Malfoy, ” crying “No–I didn’t–”) Harry tells Snape that he didn’t understand the spell, otherwise he’d never have used it. DD may have been appealing to Harry’s own understanding of fatally injuring an enemy, his efforts to help, his subsequent remorse and shame, and his sense of honor.

As to Snape’s actual source–what about Aberforth? Sure, Aberforth had a lot of resentment toward Albus, but they’d made some kind of peace; he would likely have been an Order connection. We know that Albus visits the Hog’s Head where Aberforth is barkeep (and in this book Albus takes Harry to the seemingly-empty HH to secretly and safely disapparate). And he has Aberforth watch out for Harry in DH.

33 Lily LunaNo Gravatar July 5, 2009 at 7:45 pm

Interesting thought on Aberforth. He’s probably the one person Albus might warn in advance of his death, but I don’t know that Aberforth was in on meetings or when Harry was to be moved.

34 SPTNo Gravatar July 5, 2009 at 8:24 pm

Amanda, After Harry casts his Patronus in PoA and Hermione asks him, in a panic, what he did, Harry says “I just saved all our lives”. In addition, previous to this, when the dementor was actually attacking him, Harry says that the dementor was going to finish him first. All this says “death” to me.

Don’t think it really matters anyway. As far as I am concerned, soulless husk is bad enough to qualify for a death omen.

35 SchoolMarmNo Gravatar July 5, 2009 at 10:07 pm

I was never a big fan of the Mundungus-as-unwitting-informer hypothesis, so I’m liking the Phineas idea. It could work if any members of the Order at any point discussed the plan to move Harry in DD’s office, either before or after his death (and we do know some kind of conversations occurred between DD and Order members before the Astronomy Tower: remember Kingsley’s quiz question for Lupin at the Burrow? “Harry is our greatest hope,” or whatever it was.). The portrait of Phineas could have reported the plan to Snape at Grimmauld Place during that brief interim when Snape was able to still get in there. What was Snape doing in there, anyway? I don’t know if the time line works perfectly, but they rarely do. I think there’s some potential there.

Speaking of time lines, tell me what you think of this one for Trelawney’s prophecy at the Hog’s Head. Since Trelawney remembers being interrupted, maybe that happened first, and then she went into prophet mode, and Aberforth only came to get Snape after Trelawney began the prophecy. It does seem like Aberforth and Snape might get their names on the little globe in the Department of Mysteries along with Albus, but maybe not, if they only caught part of it.

36 Arabella FiggNo Gravatar July 5, 2009 at 10:46 pm

Snape might have been “filching” the signature page of Lily’s letter to Sirius.

37 SchoolMarmNo Gravatar July 6, 2009 at 12:11 am

I don’t think Snape knew he was going to find a letter from Lily in Sirius’s bedroom when he went snooping, though. He must have had another reason to be at Grimmauld Place. Snape and Phineas might have even planned to meet there.

38 Lily LunaNo Gravatar July 6, 2009 at 12:48 am

It seemed like Snape had been searching the whole place, probably to make sure there was no important info left behind in case the death eaters DID find a way to get in (as they may have after the Ministry escape). Finding the Lily’s photo and letter was an added bonus. And he and Phineas can meet in the castle if Phineas moves to a picture out in a hallway late at night.

I’m surprised Sirius had the letter from Lily there, actually. It would have been sent to him long after he moved out and before he went to Azkaban. I doubt he can take pictures to Azkaban. That means his personal effects must have been preserved somewhere and/or by someone such that he could retrieve them after he escaped (or someone helped retrieve them after he came back to G Place).

39 revgeorgeNo Gravatar July 6, 2009 at 12:53 am

Regarding the images of the Grim, I just read that this imagery could be perhaps a mild mockery by Rowling of certain Gothic story elements. To quote,

“Certainly the Grim subplot in Prisoner, in which Harry thinks he is being haunted by a Black Dog death omen, which turns out to be his godfather working to protect him from danger rather than supernatural sign, is an echo of gothic parody a la Austen, in which natural explanations always supplant superstitious fears eventually.”

I think this helps us understand Trelawney as well. Trelawney seems to be a sort of tragio-comic figure. She is often used for laughs in the story, & she is a bit of an old fraud to a great extent. But she also has a real gift of prophecy and she is also able to use certain divination devices to see things, like tea leaves and cartomancy. But she doesn’t know she makes prophecies, & she’s always misinterpreting her other real visions, & she’s always making more of things than should be made of them. And making lots of things up to.

40 Arabella FiggNo Gravatar July 6, 2009 at 11:29 am

One more thing on the letter. Lily Luna. Don’t forget Sirius lived at the Black House for a year during OotP. Perhaps his room had never been cleaned (so no one–Kreacher?– would have to taint themselves). In any case, I can see him during his misery in OotP, comforting himself with his youthful possessions and “good old days” memories, i.e., letters and photos. Perhaps he meant to show such letter sand photos to Harry, along with others, someday.

As to Trelawney, perhaps here is again narrative misdirection. We’ve been trained, via Harry’s third-person limited omniscience, to scorn her and see her as “an old fraud.” Dumbledore doesn’t disrespect her, but doesn’t favor the arts of Divination. Thus we, the readers, actually look for things to discredit her. Yet there is more there than meets the “eye.”

41 Lily LunaNo Gravatar July 6, 2009 at 12:00 pm

I wasn’t forgetting about Sirius living at GP during OOTP, Arabella. But Sirius RECEIVED the letter when he was 20 or so after he’d moved out of his parents’ house and before going to Azkaban (his mum died while he was in Azkaban and his father predeceased her). Where were his personal effects all those years and how did he get them back? Unless the Ministry bagged up the lot of them and gave them to his Mum who put them in his room, I don’t see how or why they were preserved when everyone thought him a murderer who’d die in Azkaban.

I guess the Ministry giving his possessions to his Mum makes the most sense. They would probably want to search his home/papers for any info on V and the Death Eaters and then who else to give them to but his mother.

42 revgeorgeNo Gravatar July 6, 2009 at 12:04 pm

Here’s a question off topic, but hey, I can side-track my own thread, can’t I?

I wonder if Sirius’ mother thought better of him after he was considered to be on LV’s side & a betrayer of blood traitors & mudbloods & a Muggle killer?

43 Arabella FiggNo Gravatar July 6, 2009 at 2:23 pm

Well, now, revgeorge, that’s a point to consider. Screechy Mumsy may have felt he’d “returned to the fold.” Perhaps that’s why Sirius’ possessions were back in the house. Maybe he found a bag of them and put them away in his room.

44 Lily LunaNo Gravatar July 6, 2009 at 4:31 pm

Arabella, I was thinking exactly the same thing, that if she thought Sirius was Voldemort’s secret servant, it would rehabilitate him in her eyes and she would save his belongings rather than throw them away.

45 Lily LunaNo Gravatar July 6, 2009 at 4:33 pm

Oops, meant to say “revgeorge and Arabella,” not just “Arabella”. :-)

46 SchoolMarmNo Gravatar July 6, 2009 at 6:19 pm

revgeorge, that’s exactly what I was just thinking about. And Arabella Lily Luna, I agree that Sirius’s new reputation as being in deep with Voldemort would redeem Sirius in his mum’s eyes. That’s why I would guess that she might have been dead by the time Sirius got sent to Azkaban, because her portrait seems to think that Sirius is no good. I don’t know if portraits can change their attitudes after they’ve been done or not; Mrs. Black’s could just reflect her attitudes at the time it was done, so maybe it doesn’t tell us anything. But I’ll guess that someone did gather his personal things from wherever he was living and that those things were sent to the house, and that it was Kreacher, obligated to maintain the family’s possessions, who chucked them into the bedroom. Sirius may or may not have sorted through them, but I don’t suppose it matters.

47 Lily LunaNo Gravatar July 6, 2009 at 8:54 pm

In OOTP Sirius tells Harry no one has lived at GP for 10 years since his mum died except Kreacher. Sirius was sent to Azkaban almost 14 years earlier, so his mum died after he went to Azkaban. Even if she thought better of Sirius after he was arrested, her portrait would be swiftly disabused of any notion that he was a Death Eater when he came back and let the Order use it for HQ and allowed “mudbloods” and “blood traitors” in. By the time Harry/we meet her portrait they’ve already been using it as HQ for over a month.

48 Tarot cardsNo Gravatar February 3, 2010 at 2:30 am

Hmm Well I was just searching on Google for some Tarot readings of some Tarot reader
and just came across your blog, generally I just only visit blogs and retrieve my required
information but this time the useful information that you posted in this post compelled me
to reply here and appreciate your good work. I just bookmarked your blog

Leave a Comment

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Previous post:

Next post: