Where the Wild Things Are

by Travis Prinzi on October 11, 2009

This Friday, October 16, the film adaptation of Maurice Sendak’s great book, Where the Wild Things Are will hit the big screen. We’ll spend this week of A Hog’s Head Halloween talking about that book.

Look forward to a giveaway of the book and movie reviews later this week. The trailer for the film is below; this is the one that had the whole theater cheering at the midnight release of the Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince film.

To get this week kicked off, give us your Where the Wild Things Are stories – reading it for the first time yourself, or reading it to your kids, etc. I read it to Sophia for the first time a couple weeks ago. She loves it, and gets very excited at the four “Terribles” – except that on the last one, she always reminds me, “And I don’t like those terrible claws.”

  • Share/Bookmark

{ 15 comments… read them below or add one }

1 revgeorgeNo Gravatar October 12, 2009 at 11:23 am

My story will be extremely short: I think I read it once as a young boy. Didn’t really do anything for me & haven’t really read it since. However, I do like Where the Deep Ones Are by Kenneth Hite. :)

2 Red RockerNo Gravatar October 12, 2009 at 11:40 am

My 8 year old says they read the book in school “a long time ago”. I had never heard of it until seeing the trailer and reading about it here. Must say the trailer – or rather the soundtrack – is very moving.

I did see a couple of things in Wikipedia which made me sit up and pay attention though:

Francis Spufford suggests that the book is “one of the very few picture books to make an entirely deliberate, and beautiful, use of the psychoanalytic story of anger”.

and

Sendak, in his book the Art of Maurice Sendak, discusses Where the Wild Things Are, In the Night Kitchen, and Outside Over There as books in a trilogy [8] centered on Children’s growth, survival, change and fury.

He writes that they

“are all variations on the same theme: how children master various feelings…”

Obviously I hadn’t thought about the book enough. The interpretation that it’s a story about how children master anger is an incredibly powerful one. And the knowledge that Sendak can express this in nine sentences makes me shake my head in awe.

3 JessicaNo Gravatar October 12, 2009 at 2:16 pm

Ironically, I never bought this book, but I used to check it out of the library and read it over and over. I really should pick it up XD
I remember liking Max (basically sympathizing with him), being scared of the Wild Things, but the thing I remember most is the drawings of the Wild Things. When I saw the Wild Things trailer and saw them live I knew (even before I saw the title) that it was based on my beloved book.

Anyone know where I can purchase a hardcover? ^^;

4 Steve MorrisonNo Gravatar October 12, 2009 at 4:30 pm

Jessica, this link goes to a list of search results for the hardcover.

5 deacondonNo Gravatar October 12, 2009 at 4:47 pm

Another feature movie based on a wonderful 25 page children’s book. I’m sure it will have all kinds of backstory filled in with things that we don’t really need to know that will only detract from the story. Like the Grinch and Polar Express movies a few years back. Big Red Barn and Goodnight Moon are next, probably. Oh well. No thanks.

There was a very nice Czech cartoon version made back in the 70’s using Sendak’s own drawings. Peter Schickele (aka P.D.Q. Bach) wrote the score and narrates. Seven minutes long, and it is perfect. I have the DVD version with Schickele reading In the Night Kitchen in sprechstimme, and Carol King singing The Nutshell Kids. Indespensible for anybody with or without kids.

6 JessicaNo Gravatar October 12, 2009 at 4:54 pm

*excited*
Thank-you Steve :D

7 JoivreNo Gravatar October 12, 2009 at 5:05 pm

Yes, I remember the PDQ Bach version well. It was perfect. Though I have not said the movie, I saw the trailer. It missed an important trope of the story for me as a child. One, being the power of the imagination. Max was and still is Steve McQueen’s Hilts, aka “the Cooler King” from The Great Escape. He’s Cool Hand Luke – the rebel no one can keep down. He’s Mc Murphy in One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s nest. – send me to my room? No problem Nurse Ratchet. I got a mind and I’m free to rompus all I want in there.

Pascal says in Pensees – “Man’s unhappiness springs from one thing alone, his incapacity to stay quietly in one room. A man wealthy enough for life’s needs would never leave home to go to sea or beseige some fortress if he knew how to stay at home and enjoy it” And this is what Max does. It makes no difference if he is confined to his room or a jail cell – he is most definitely free.

8 FrickaNo Gravatar October 12, 2009 at 7:12 pm

Well, I don’t remember reading WTWTA as a child, and as an adolescent, I was rather unimpressed with Sendak’s illustations, my tastes running more along the line of Beatrix Potter and Eloise Wilkin.
However, as an adult now, I am willing to enter into a discussion about the merits of the story; just want you all to know that I will be coming from the direction of the film primarily. ( I’m looking forward to seeing that!)

9 R. RossNo Gravatar October 12, 2009 at 9:02 pm

a quote….
“That’s the best
fun in all of this—
the layers of meaning,
the layers of storytelling”

—Maurice Sendak, August 2007

10 R. RossNo Gravatar October 12, 2009 at 9:31 pm

In an interview between Bill Moyers and Maurice Sendak.

Moyers talking of Joseph Campbell, once said that one of the great moments in literature is this scene in WHERE THE WILD THINGS ARE: “And when he came to the place where the wild things are, they roared their terrible roars and gnashed their terrible teeth and rolled their terrible eyes and showed their terrible claws till Max said, ‘Be still’ and tamed them with the magic trick of staring into all their yellow eyes without blinking once. And they were frightened and called him the most wild thing of all and made him king of all wild things.”

Joseph Campbell read. And he said, “That is a great moment because it’s only when a man tames his own demons that he becomes the king of himself if not of the world.” And he said that was a great moment in literature.

11 JoivreNo Gravatar October 13, 2009 at 12:15 am

That’s an interesting set of quotes RRoss. But what it doesn’t protray is that there are a huge amount of artists who never tamed their own “demons”. Like Poe or Goethe, the Shakespeare of Gothic, or Jane Austin, or Stephen King (at his height) or even Ms. Rowling with her addiction to nicotine. Whether or not we tame our demons, I love the quote of Glenn Gould again, one of my favorite – “We would not be artists, if we were not in a state of flux.”

12 MelodyNo Gravatar October 13, 2009 at 12:28 am

My students (upper elementary) still like to roar their terrible roars and gnash their terrible teeth when I read this book to them each year. They get into lively discussions about the passage of time in the story and whether the trip was real or not. (And if it’s all in Max’s head, why on earth should that mean that it is not real?) I also use it to model writing strategies such as effective use of repetition.

13 JessicaNo Gravatar October 13, 2009 at 12:33 am

Melody. I like your veiled quote of Dumbledore saying if it was in Harry’s head, why should it mean it’s not real XD
Your awesome.

14 diva_alixNo Gravatar October 14, 2009 at 1:37 am

I remember always liking this book as a child. deacondon you raise an interesting point. I’d sort of like to see this movie, BUT I do remember being thoroughly unimpressed with the film Polar Express. The book was lovely, but the movie felt forced and uninspired to me.
RR’s point about anger is really interesting. It’s important for children to learn how to process and deal with anger, and I think the book is helpful to that end. The book also depicts a boy in a situation in which he feels pretty powerless moving, via his imagination, into a place where he does have power. The adults having all of the power is one of the most frustrating aspects of being a kid and that’s why the imagination is so crucial for them (though for us adults too, of course).
Cute story, one of my nephews, Nicholas, loves this book. He’s a very wild boy, and his terrible twos were quite terrible indeed. His mom used to always read him this book and change the name Max to Nicholas because he loved the book so much. When Nick got a little older, he learned that the boy in the story was really named Max and was mad, his name is supposed to be Nicholas!!

15 Travis PrinziNo Gravatar October 14, 2009 at 1:24 pm

Lots of great discussion happening here!

RRoss, Campbell is probably looking at the Wild Things through his usual lens of Jungian archetypes, and the Wild Things probably represent Max’s shadow side which he must incorporate properly into himself and cause to “be still.” The Wild Things don’t go away; they just learn to function in a healthy way within Max’s psyche.

I think it’s significant, though, that Max isn’t content with the Wild Things, despite being their king. I think “BE STILL” is a great moment of conquering anger and fear, but going away from family and being king in a distant land makes Max lonely.

Which is why, for me, the better part of the story is when he needs to go home, and his food is still hot. Which is why I’m inclined to think Pascal was a bit off the mark on this.

I anticipate tears when I see this on Saturday night.

I’m actually looking forward to the movie, because right around the time of Prisoner of Azkaban – really, because of Prisoner, as well as the LotR films – I made a hard break in my mind between the page and the screen. Actors in the HP films rarely, if ever, invade my reading of the books. And I won’t be upset at the obvious additions they’ll have to make to create a full length movie, as long as the movie works well in and of itself and captures the spirit of the book.

Leave a Comment

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Previous post:

Next post: