<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who Killed Albus Dumbledore?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thehogshead.org/who-killed-albus-dumbledore-284/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thehogshead.org/who-killed-albus-dumbledore-284/</link>
	<description>Harry Potter News and Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 18:19:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joyce Odell</title>
		<link>http://thehogshead.org/who-killed-albus-dumbledore-284/comment-page-1/#comment-22712</link>
		<dc:creator>Joyce Odell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 18:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swordofgryffindor.com/2006/11/21/who-killed-albus-dumbledore/#comment-22712</guid>
		<description>First, let me extend apoligies for what appears to be an oversight. The chapter and theory which your PubCast discusses is not actually in the final published version of &#039;Who Killed ALbus Dumbledore?&#039;

No. Not at all. Even the chapter title is different.

We were ready to go to press with it when Rowling made her announcement -- which sent us scrambling to apply emergency patches and disclaimers. That interim version seems to have been the version you got. 

However, due to a delay in coordination among six contributors and the project manager, as well as some 11th hour realizations, my chapter was completely revised and the whole section regarding the overheard Prophecy was discarded to make room for issues which are far more germaine to the central investigation of that chapter, namely the Case of the Fallen Headmaster. The chapter now concerns only the question of to what degree the Murder of Albus Dumbledore was &quot;rigged&quot;, and its possible effect upon the final segment of the story arc.

The chapter is now entitled &#039;Welcome to My Murder: Act I&#039;.

Thank you for bringing the book to attention, hgowever, and for your review on amazon.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, let me extend apoligies for what appears to be an oversight. The chapter and theory which your PubCast discusses is not actually in the final published version of &#8216;Who Killed ALbus Dumbledore?&#8217;</p>
<p>No. Not at all. Even the chapter title is different.</p>
<p>We were ready to go to press with it when Rowling made her announcement &#8212; which sent us scrambling to apply emergency patches and disclaimers. That interim version seems to have been the version you got. </p>
<p>However, due to a delay in coordination among six contributors and the project manager, as well as some 11th hour realizations, my chapter was completely revised and the whole section regarding the overheard Prophecy was discarded to make room for issues which are far more germaine to the central investigation of that chapter, namely the Case of the Fallen Headmaster. The chapter now concerns only the question of to what degree the Murder of Albus Dumbledore was &#8220;rigged&#8221;, and its possible effect upon the final segment of the story arc.</p>
<p>The chapter is now entitled &#8216;Welcome to My Murder: Act I&#8217;.</p>
<p>Thank you for bringing the book to attention, hgowever, and for your review on amazon.com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
